|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
A couple weeks ago Lamont Cranston (wasn't it Lamont?) discussed his aggressive moves to avoid taxes. Now TG discusses hers...
With all due respect to those of you who wish to debate the merits of either Lamont's approach or TG's, may I suggest that the real question is much larger than that? At issue is whether the majority, simply by virtue of being the majority, have a right to part of my earnings. By what standard, by what definition of justice, could such a right be thought to exist?
OM
-- TG wrote:
> I have NO LEGAL obligation to the IRS. They see
> it like this. I do not see their authority over
> me... I only have two words to say to the IRS when
> they call my offshore banker, and so does he, and the
> first word starts with an F, and the second word
> starts with an O.
> They are unclassy, mafia-types, that will ruin my
> life if I don't pay (if I give them the chance)...
> IS THIS FREEDOM??? is this the price we pay for it?
> I have a better price, it is called going for it, and
> getting my money offshore.
|