|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jim,
That's what I was trying to get at......how this fix interacts with SP1 or SP2.
There was no date on the hotfix at the MS site. Are you sure it predates SP2?
Then you wrote:
> I just experimented with this hotfix install. I hadn't visited the MS 2000
> web site in quite a while. soI first decided to install the SP2 upgrade.
> That was my first mistake. As it turns out the hotfix predates this upgrade
> and won't install afterqwards. So, I uninstalled it. Simple enough with the
> Add/Remove programs.
Did you mean uninstalling SP2?
If so, are you sure that was necessary.
The reason I was so anal about the hotfix date was precisely because if
*hotfix* predated SP2 then, per MS warning, this could already be incorporated
into the latest service pack.......IOW, no need to separately install the
hotfix.
Again, IOW, maybe just installing SP2 will solve the problem.
>Installintg the hotfix then had no effect in my system.
> My speed is slower to write to the hard drives with this system which does
> have the ATA 100 hardware. My oder computer is twice as fast. Specifically,
> the write speed to my C drive is 5000kb/sec
So let's see. You uninstalled SP2 and installed the hotfix.......and it didn't
work. How about installing SP2 again. Worth a try!
> Any ideas? Let me know. I'm sure I'll get by as is. I do appreciate that
> benchmark program. It works pretty good.
>
>
> Jim Bronke
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "E" <eckho@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "omega-list" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Off topic: HD tweak
>
>
> > 1800% is phenomenal, for any endeavor.....hard drive performance.....and
> > especially trading stocks and futures! <G> So this got my attention, for
> sure!
> >
> > But seriously I went to the MS link and what they said raised more
> questions
> > than answers:
> >
> > 1. There was no date on this hotfix......so we don't know whether it
> > predated sp1 and sp2.
> > What dates that were there:
> >
> > English version of the fix was dated 04/27/2000
> >
> > This page was last reviewed May 16, 2001.......whatever that means!
> >
> > 2. MS further recommends that, unless the user is *severly affected*,
> to
> > wait until the next service pack. This sounds weird.....they don't sound
> very
> > confident about their fix at all. Of course, the question is, again, when
> this
> > document was created and therefore whether the problem has been addressed
> by
> > sp1 or sp2.
> >
> > Bill, perhaps you can enlighten.............did you get sp2 for your W2K.
> It
> > was released in the last couple of weeks.
> >
> > But thanks for the info anyway. I'm gonna have to run the test when I get
> my
> > W2K system next week.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Wynne" <tradewynne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 15:49
> > Subject: Off topic: HD tweak
> >
> >
> > > Win2K / ATA 100 HD users:
> > >
> > > Found my "fast" new hard drive was running slower than my old "slow" one
> > > with this free utility Mpower 1.1:
> > >
> > > http://www.mindbeat.com/utils.shtml
> > >
> > > Turns out Win2K was missing a patch:
> > >
> > > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/2/33.ASP
> > >
> > > This "minor" tweak increased my HD performance 1800%...yeah, 18X.
> > >
> > > BW
> > >
> > >
> >
>
|