[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] DJIA - the next 4 years



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Here is another historical stock market source for mid 1850s to mid 1880s
http://hometown.aol.com/thkalinke/homepage/19CSPP.html

This is a very interesting article about long term historical returns on
stocks and bonds
http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/402/2cent.htm

Regards,

Norman



----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] DJIA - the next 4 years


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <apitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [RT] DJIA - the next 4 years
>
>
> > Norman,
> >
> > Where can we find DJI data going back that far? Mine only goes to
> > 1928.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > AS
>
>   My charts are hard copies. The now defunct Foundation for the Study of
> Cycles offered a 200 year stock market chart.  Securities Research Company
> in the Boston area also used to sell a big 200 year stock market wall
chart.
> You can get the DJIA from 1895 here
> http://averages.dowjones.com/jsp/industrialAverages.jsp
> Here is the US stock market 1800 - 1900
> http://www.sharelynx.net/Charts/USDJIND1800-1900.gif
> You can get other related charts at the same website here
> http://www.sharelynx.net/Charts/Historical.htm#COMMODITIES
>
> I recommend reading mucho economic and financial history.  I recommend
> Charles P. Kindleberger's
> Panics, Manias, & Crashes.
>
> Historically,
>
> Norman
>
>
>
> >
> > --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Stan,
> > >
> > >  The rule of alternation would say that the 2000 Bubble top will
> > not unravel like the 1929 top.   Check out the 1873-74 top and
> > ensuing period for what is probably a more similar period.   1942 was
> > the bottom of the 46 year cycle via Saturn -Uranus synodical period.
> > That probably repeated via the '87 crash low.  As for expecting the
> > market to bounce back after 3-4 years, most generational bubbles
> > unravel over 10-20 year perods.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Norman
> > >   ----- Original Message -----
> > >   From: Stan Book
> > >   To: Realtraders
> > >   Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:25 PM
> > >   Subject: Re: [RT] DJIA - the next 4 years
> > >
> > >
> > >    A number of intelligent folks equate the 2000 top with the 1929
> > top. It
> > >   took a quarter century for the DJIA to exceed the '29 high, and a
> > decade and
> > >   a half to convinvingly break out above the 1000 ceiling after
> > the '66 top.
> > >
> > >   Some seem to think Oct lows marked the halfway point in time and
> > price for this bear
> > >   market. Others expect a 4 year extension of the bear market.
> > >
> > >   The way I read cycles, the 2002 bottom correlates with the 1942
> > and 1962
> > >   bottoms. All three are final lows of the first 20 year components
> > of 40 year
> > >   cycles. After 1942 and 1962, the first 4 year component of the
> > succeeding 20
> > >   year cycle extended the topping process of their 40 year cycles
> > and produced
> > >   new DJIA highs (a right translation of the 40 year cycles). Over
> > the past 80
> > >   years, the first 4 year component of every 20 year cycle has
> > trended
> > >   strongly up. -See attachment-
> > >
> > >   Can someone give me a sound cyclical basis for the expectation
> > that it will
> > >   be different this time? Have cycles stopped working? Am I missing
> > something?
> > >
> > >   For all the predictions of eminent crashes expressed on this
> > forum across the top, the
> > >   DJIA is essentially where it was 4 years ago (down 34% from its
> > high top).The1929
> > >   top which was characterized by a parabolic rise followed by a
> > severe drop
> > >   which took 90% out of the DJIA by 1932. The move into the 2000
> > DJIA high, which was
> > >   decidedly non-parabolic, was followed by a broadening top
> > formation.
> > >
> > >   Equivalence to 1929 would require a DJIA drop to 1200 in 2003.
> > >   Just my 4 cents --Stan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > >               ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >   realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/