|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Isn't that the same as saying I am a C++ programmer and I have a brand
new pad of paper in front of me....its better than TS cause I can do
anything and create anything I want?
Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivo Karindi [mailto:ivo@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 2:43 AM
> To: Mark Brown
> Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re[3]: QuantStudio demo available
>
>
> MB> i mean full programming language has yet to prove an
> advantage over
> MB> scripting languages when it comes to profitability in
> trading. more
> MB> difficult does not mean more money.
>
> Well, I can not say that we are making any money with QS yet
> as all our stuff is still running in TS/dll's/PHP, but WOW
> what a software product it is! The best comparison between TS
> and QS that I can think of is that TS is a mainstream sports
> car that you can buy from the $tealer while QS is a garage
> full of supercar parts out of which you can build practically
> anything you can possibly imagine. QS will require quite some
> knowledge and work from the user in order to accomplish
> anything. However, unlike TS, practically *anything* is
> possible using QS - if you want, you can program it to make
> your morning coffee. ;)
>
> My opinion about the graphics and charts is that although
> having graphics like TS is definitely desirable, QS is more
> oriented towards system traders who would rather run 50
> systems on 500 symbols automatically without having to ever
> look at any charts. QS is *not* a product for discretionary
> chartists - there's plenty of stuff available for them anyway.
>
> Ivo Karindi
>
>
|