[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Comstock and quote.com



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

"I don't buy for a second the
BMI claim that they can't add bandwidth."

I'll go even one further:  I bet they slow it intentionally.  What ever
happened to BMI's brand new 56K V-Line before DBC bought BMI out?  I
remember having to back down to 36.6 after DBC got their grimy ass hands on
it.

Riddle me that DBC, you fn crooks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Holverstott [mailto:dennis@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 1:18 PM
> To: Omega List
> Subject: Comstock and quote.com
>
>
> Riddle me this. :-) Everyone seems to praise Comstock as a "premium"
> data feed and everyone ridicules quote.com's obviously crummy EOD data.
> Problem is quote.com gets their crummy data from Comstock. So is
> Comstock really any good or does everyone just assume it is because it
> costs so much? Will tradestation.com have the same crummy EOD data as
> quote.com?
>
> ps - sorry TJ but I'll take realtime quote.com tick data for the e-mini
> over BMI any day. You must have lousy internet service to be so critical
> of quote.com. It ain't perfect but, on balance, it's a better tick feed
> than BMI.
>
> pps - I'll second the hope that DTN doesn't go away. They are a Bridge
> feed which seems to have better EOD data than Comstock and they have
> enough bandwidth to handle all the ticks. I don't buy for a second the
> BMI claim that they can't add bandwidth. They just want to force
> everybody to use E-Signal cuz it's cheaper and easier for them. Problem
> is there are better internet feeds than E-Signal so it's lose/lose for
> DBC and BMI.
>
> --
>   Dennis
>