[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2000i



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I'm one of those newbies.  Came from the Metastock camp myself.  Looking for
more versatility and programmability than Metastock offers.  The box just
arrived an hour ago with the invoice for $200/m x 12 = $2400.  I expected
the box to weigh about 5 lbs from it's size and expecting a stack of manuals
about 4 inches thick.  Is anyone familiar with Autodesk's product AutoCad?
This is real software.  It cost me about $2400.  It has a very well written
and thorough set of manuals to go with it too.  The pathetic set of manuals
that come with TS2000i is in itself nearly enough for me to just put it back
in the box, get an RMA, and return it without even attempting to install it.
I'm curious though how it will perform on my Dell XPS R450 128MRAM Win98
puter.  Well for now I think I'll just get Ensign up and running on the DTN
dish whilst I monitor this list and peruse the skimpy manuals.  Maybe during
the 30 free trial I'll discover that Ensign is the tool I need and I can
return the EDDY BEAN PRIME PREMIUM GOOSE LIVER DOWN FILLED SWISS CHICKEN
ARMY KNIFE to it's maker.

Chuck

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew <warlord@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Phil Sih <FillC@xxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: 2000i


> I don't think you guys are being paid to be beta testers.
> The problems you are describing are too obvious to be missed.
> The situation is more like that in the games segment of IT industry.
> You got a dateline, you need the cashflow, you release a
> build and then have a patch ready shortly after for problems
> you already know of and then promised you will be on for the
> rest.
>
> >The sad truth about this is that customers are being used as paid
> >beta testers. Also product appears to be written by amateur or junior
> >programmers who just get it done for the features and ignore the
> >performance issues. I'll bet that if we actually went to Omega and
> >looked at what they're running, they would have a hard time producing
> >a working demo on even the recommended configuration they suggest
> >which is lower capacity than the machine I was using.
>
>