[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: OT:Two DSL Services



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: OT:Two DSL Services

wm - as noted in my note, the FCC has approved use of electric lines for broadband.  See http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/15/technology/15power.html?
 
As mentioned, we no longer need it.
 
"10 to 100 MB wireless transmission with reception assured by small cigar-shaped antennae was introduced two years ago; it is, naturally, in existence nowhere (except a few small private real-estate developments where the developer is the transmitter and the owners/lessors are the receivers. Why? Because the technology is too good - It has a range of 10 to 20 miles,and too cheap - parts cost about the same, or less than individual home networking devices used now."
 
wm - Oh, I don't know about not needing it.  Once you leave simple home or limited area-type installations for the "big wide world" things get very expensive.  Ask the Australians who got it recently (maybe they have a market in the boonies).  I'll opt for an electiric line that is competitively priced vis-a-vis DSL, etc.  Anything that is not competitively priced, reflecting $$$ to get things going, etc., will not fly, imo.
 
Maybe we agree about something....but not this.  How could it be preferable to plug into rusty copper?  when wireless is available that extends 30 miles (beyond the last power pole...or anywhere else)  at the same or less money?  Maybe it's a matter of preference. OK. Let the buyer decide. FCC is not a competent technology Czar, is it?  Look at dial up. Why should they be permitted to stifle wireless in favor of rust?  But they are. Otherwise we would have had the 30 mile wireless last year, not this rust belt relic, Dear Mother.
 
wm - as noted above the Australians might be interested in the boonies (non-electified).  However, if a electric wire (does not rust) goes to your place and it is significantly cheaper than wireless, wireless is dead.  Electric utilities have the infrastructure in place and appear able to deliver at a competitive rate, and the FCC has OK'd it.  So most likely it will fly.  I don't know the story of FCC and wireless and what problems wireless has in our airwaves, but based on Australia's experience it will not fly because of cost (about A$350).  I have no axe to grind and just want good, economical service, which electric seems to have the potential to offer.  Only raised this subject to find out if anyone knew the status and not to debate the merits.  Enuf ced.  We'll see how things play out.


Check AmiBroker web page at:
http://www.amibroker.com/

Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html




Check AmiBroker web page at:
http://www.amibroker.com/

Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html




Yahoo! Groups Links