----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 1:42
PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: OT:Two DSL
Services
As mentioned, we no longer need it.
"10 to 100 MB wireless
transmission with reception assured by small cigar-shaped antennae was
introduced two years ago; it is, naturally, in existence nowhere
(except a few small private real-estate developments where the developer is
the transmitter and the owners/lessors are the receivers. Why? Because the
technology is too good - It has a range of 10 to 20 miles,and too cheap -
parts cost about the same, or less than individual home networking devices
used now."
wm - Oh, I don't know about not
needing it. Once you leave simple home or limited area-type
installations for the "big wide world" things get very expensive. Ask
the Australians who got it recently (maybe they have a market in the
boonies). I'll opt for an electiric line that is competitively priced
vis-a-vis DSL, etc. Anything that is not competitively priced,
reflecting $$$ to get things going, etc., will not fly,
imo.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: OT:Two
DSL Services
Off Topic: DSL and wireless connection
technology...in America
We have been hearing about this piggy-backing of ISPs on
high voltage copper for nearly ten years; one must assume,
therefore, that until FCC willingly bows out of the arena (or is blessedly
disbanded by a quorum of sober legislators)...that nothing will be
done.
snip
MR