|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I am fully OK for a testing group,
- I can't be the leader because of my poor english, I write it like
french language and sometimes I am totally misunderstood.
- I think it must be a private group <=5 Persons ( previous
experiences have showed me that two much people leads to noise)
- The backtester of Amibroker has actually a limitation:
it is a coumpound equity.
a fixed equity would be more real life and could be manage the money
with a stop loss adapted to your risk
BUT TZ HAS PROMIZED AN UPGRADE ^__^
-So, actually I go on backtesting a universe of stocks with a dll on
MS.
SC
>
> If a testing project gets goind, would it be best for it to be put
an
> a separate discussion board?
>
> I can see advantages for testing posts to be a separate board
> dedicated to that. It would be easier to scan post titles.
>
> I can see advantages for testing posts to be on the current AB
board.
> Others might get curious, make the occassional helpful comment, and
> might join the testing project.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Tomasz, what do you think? Would it be easier for you to have
testing
> posts on a separate board which you likely would not need to look
at
> as often as you do for the main discussion board? I am assuming
> testing posts would have not be discussing bugs, wish lists for new
> features, basic how-to questions, etc. Would you want to be the
> formal owner/founder of any new board? I think having the developer
> as formal owner of this board contributes to its great success.
>
> b
|