|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tomasz-
I agree with your conclusion. Is it possible to have a switch in Amibroker to select summary or full report?
I believe the summary should include the excellent feature that you have developed to show the settings and list the afl at the top.
Regards,
-Tom
Tomasz Janeczko wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> The reason why the backtesting reports are huge is not
> the HTML format, but the fact that there is really huge
> amount of data to be presented.
>
> AmiBroker generates minimal (hand optimized) HTML code
> without ANY unneeded tags, it also uses CSS tag redefinition
> to minimize the size of HTML output.
>
> I would suggest to share only OVERALL (summary) results
> without individual stock results.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> ===============
> AmiBroker - the comprehensive share manager.
> http://www.amibroker.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom McDaniel" <tmtempe@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Testing Projects Question #2
>
> > Stephane & all-
> >
> > 1) My original testing was as the author described trading his model. I
> > entered long (next day's open) When the trend indicator was positive and
> > the direction was positive. I stayed long until the direction changed
> > and then reversed to a short (next day's open). I did add a 10%
> > trailing stop to see if I could stem the big losers.
> >
> > Attached is a screen shot of my test results. (This leads to a question
> > for Tomaz - Is there an easy way to share test results without using
> > giant files? I tried to save the test results file and it looked to be
> > creating a giant HTML file so I stopped the save. I tried to save it as
> > a .txt file (thinking I would edit the details for each stock) and got a
> > 0 size file.)
> >
> > I would happily participate in such a back testing (optimizing)
> > exercise. I think a group process would be quite useful and would be a
> > great learning experience. I think the other benefit would be a better
> > understanding of the indicators and models presented. I have been
> > disappointed with the documentation and supporting information on
> > indicators, systems and models put forth by others. I find them to be
> > much like the "black box" systems in that It is difficult to understand
> > what theory is behind them and why and how they work. Perhaps this
> > exercise could lead to generally better documentation of materials
> > posted in the library.
> >
> > I am not sure that I am a strong enough programmer to lead the effort.
> > I also have limited time available so my contributions could be rather
> > sporadic.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Tom McDaniel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|