|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I sent away for Delta several years ago. The reason is that the system I use
has 3 independent parts. One part based upon time, one based upon momentum
and one based upon price. If there is something out there that I feel will
enhance one of these parts, then I want to look at it. In the case of Delta,
it might help enhance the time factor. I have been at this for over 30 years
and I am still learning. The funny part about it is that the things that
seem to work have been around for a much longer period of time then I have.
There have been individuals who have taken ideas from the past and tried to
improve on them. Who had fib numbers before DeNapoli? Who used Stochastics
before Lane? Who had On Balance Volume before Granville and Williams? How
much of what we do today had its formation decades ago? We may have better
tools to analyze with now, but what we do seems to be founded in the past.
Have a good week end. Ira.
Prosper wrote:
> Delta,
>
> Your chart came through and it does seem to look like what you are
> saying. Delta is ok I guess, I sure didn't like the sales tactics that
> we tried on me by thier sales persons. I doubt that there are many here
> that haven't received the sales pitch for delta, one way or another. I
> for one never bought it, but I have seen it. Many of this group have
> been on the RT forum for as many as 5 or 6 years. Delta has been
> discussed many times before. Some people swear by it like they do
> astrology and other methods. There are lists at yahoo that are
> specifically for those kind of things. Otherwise, if it works for you
> that's great!
>
> Prosper
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|