[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Validity of orbital element



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


What is the basis for your disagreement?  I said 
"At least in the case of the moon, as evidenced by your example, there is 
a strong correlation between a body in outer space and 
markets, and this correlation might very well be a valid basis for 
trading purposes."  
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Norman 
  Winski 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 1:10 
PM
  Subject: Re: [RT] Validity of orbital 
  element
  
  Bill,
   
     Cause and effect are not needed to 
  make money. The purpose of this discussion is not to make a breakthough 
  in Astrophysics.  If I find a good correlation, I am going to exploit it 
  to make money until it stops working. On the other hand, a strong repititive 
  correlation between extra-terrrestrial bodies and human behavior may someday 
  lead to some scientific discoveries. Maybe I will leave some of my 
  money to a science foundation to research this.
   
  Cheers,
   
  Norman  
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
    wavemechanic 
    
    To: <A 
    title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    
    Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 2:12 
    PM
    Subject: Re: [RT] Validity of orbital 
    element
    
    Clyde:
     
    You have put your finger on the misunderstanding 
    between the two "camps" in this debate, but given the number of posts 
    on this subject I think it is worth underlining.
     
    Your correlation regarding use of the new moon for 
    timing might very well be quite significant in a statistical sense.  As 
    you note, this correlation is strong "regardless of whether the moon itself 
    is influencing the markets."  Exactly right.  Observation of 
    an effect cannot by itself prove or disprove a causal relationship.  No 
    matter how statistically significant the correlation is it cannot prove 
    causation.  Cause and effect can only be established by a theory that 
    explains the observed correlation.  So in a very real sense everybody 
    is right.  At least in the case of the moon, as evidenced by your 
    example, there is a strong correlation between a body in outer 
    space and markets, and this correlation might very well be a valid 
    basis for trading purposes.  However, absent a theoretical basis 
    for connecting outer space bodies with markets, there is no basis 
    for claiming a cause and effect relationship between 
    them.
     
    Bill
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
      Clyde 
      Lee 
      To: <A 
      title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      
      Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 11:28 
      PM
      Subject: Re: [RT] Validity of orbital 
      element
      
      Well it is nice to see someone post a 
      detailed set of math
      concerning the planets and other 
      bodies (particularly the
      moon) and claim that this set of math 
      proves that such
      bodies cannot have any influence on 
      our markets.
       
      I just want to post again a simple 
      graph that shows the
      results of buying on some selected 
      number of days after
      the new moon and selling 8 days 
      later.
       
      To me it is amazing that we get such 
      a STRONG indication
      that regardless of whether the moon 
      itself is influencing
      the markets that the markets react 
      periodically in a 
      manner that is tied to the moon 
      cycle.
       
      If you were to do this same study and 
      change the period
      of time representing the moon cycle 
      by even 1/4 day the
      whole thing "goes to hell".  I 
      ran a test where I varied
      the cycle in increments of  
      0.01  day and was amazed that
      even a very minor miscalculation in 
      moon period would
      destroy this 
      relationship.
       
      Actually, the above seems to me to 
      more concretely show
      the influence is from the 'MOON 
      EFFECT' than from anything
      else we can imagine.
       
      Look at the graph -- choose the right 
      days and you will
      make money, choose the wrong days and 
      you will lose.
       
      How simple can you make it 
      ??????
       
       
      Clyde
       
       
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - 
      -Clyde Lee   
      Chairman/CEO          (Home 
      of SwingMachine)SYTECH 
      Corporation          email: 
      clydelee@xxxxxxxxxxxx  
      7910 Westglen, Suite 105       
      Office:    (713) 783-9540Houston,  TX  
      77063               
      Fax:    (713) 783-1092Details 
      at:                      
      www.theswingmachine.com- 
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - -
      <BLOCKQUOTE 
      style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        <DIV 
        style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
        <A title=research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        href="mailto:research@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Research Dept. 
        To: <A 
        title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        
        Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 
        21:48
        Subject: [RT] Validity of orbital 
        element
        Hello Real Traders? ,I  humbly submit 
        the  following  argument against  planetary 
        influenceupon the earths financial markets. I  can only comment 
        upon the earthsbecause I have not yet been privileged enough to 
        trade other planetaryTo unsubscribe from 
      this group, send an email 
      to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
      use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
      href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
    use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
    href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
    To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.