|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#fff8e0>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>SORRY,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>this is "gary in hawaii" i have
compiled a HUGE list to my group lately. The above </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>"partial e-mails", i must of typed
them in wrong! I keep getting "returned....unknown". My
guess is that i obviously skipped/missed something in the above e-mail
addresses?! Sorry!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>so if the above subject line looks familiar in
your email, or if you want me to add you to my group for FREE, just please mail
me a "yes" with your correct address, thanks/sorry,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2><A
href="mailto:charlie@xxxxxxxxxx";>charlie@xxxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>gary</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>hawaii </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Oct 03 15:57:40 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 24880
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 18:50:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id PAA04176;
Sat, 3 Oct 1998 15:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.erols.com (smtp3.erols.com [207.172.3.236])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id PAA04049
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 15:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from erols.com (207-172-36-28.s28.tnt6.ann.erols.com [207.172.36.28])
by smtp3.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA05024;
Sat, 3 Oct 1998 18:45:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3616A90A.8BA55BAC@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1998 18:45:30 -0400
Reply-To: pmperry@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter M. Perry" <pmperry@xxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Latin anyone
References: <199810032209.SAA23352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ABFABA7B99736971D16F160B"
X-To: faschim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Cc: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en]C-DIAL (Win98; I)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Frode,
<P>Try http://dictionaries.travlang.com/EnglishLatin/dict.cgi?query=*trade&max=50
<P>It's a latin-english online dictionary.
<P>Peter Perry
<P>Frode L. Aschim wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>I know this may sound absurd, but I am searching
for the latin translation of the following words:trading and tradetrendtechnicaladaptivewinningAnyone
strong in latin?? Help appreciated.Have a nice week of trading.Personally
I am reversing a long position on Dec Corn alt hedging it with a put except
for that going to stay very quiet on monday. Correlation with previous
years, world demand, momentum and general uncertainty makes me do the trade..
<P><x-html>Best greetings,
<P>Frode L. Aschim
<P>Email: frode@xxxxxxxxxx
<BR>
<P>Thought of the day:
<BR>"Don't follow leaders, watch your parking meters"
<BR>R. Zimmerman c. 1967</x-html></BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Oct 03 18:35:28 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 15018
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 21:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id SAA07687;
Sat, 3 Oct 1998 18:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id SAA07552
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 18:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RL2946@xxxxxxx
by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id AWHWa19214
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 21:26:08 +2000 (EDT)
Message-Id: <db2557fe.3616ceb0@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 21:26:08 EDT
Reply-To: RL2946@xxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: RL2946@xxxxxxx
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GEN: Bradley & CIT for the stockmarket
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 167
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
In a message dated 9/26/98 8:07:49 AM Central Daylight Time,
bfulks@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
RealTraders,
Cantankerous as the market is, it did seem to follow script. Basis the
close, the cash SP500 did make a high pivot on 9-28 and a low pivot on 10-1.
Those were the two dates indicated to watch for a change in trend. It was our
good fortune to have been privy to the analysis of Ben "profittaker" and Walt
Downs, both of whom called for 1-2 day drops in this time bracket. Should be
inadvisable to judge the use of Astrology/Astronomy in trading based on this
one presentation, whether you agree with my view of adherence of the market to
the forces at play on the two forecast days. Although, such use might be
worth investigating.
Best results in all you endeavor,
Rory Lewellen RL2946@xxxxxxx
>
> >The end of Sept., beginning of Oct. looks interesting for a possible
> >change in trend. Kasanjian Research's Bradley for Windows shows 10-1-98
> >for the Bradley M and 9-28-98 for the Bradley 5. Curiously, the software
> >program's displays are completely independent of any market data, the
> >algorithms being based solely on the interplay of celestial bodies. Of
> >course, this says nothing of the direction of the subsequent price action,
> >even if the signals prove accurate. (If they do prove out, the market's
> >action will probably be attributed to Mr. Greenspan's pronouncements.)
> >Perhaps the market will convince that we really aren't in the waning days
> >of wave 4 of an impulsive 5 wave down pattern. This is not a trade
> >recommendation.
>
|