|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Rters,
For those who wanted more information on Bradley, Stock Market
Prediction gives exact details on how to go about in calculating
the line of aspectivity or as Bradley calls it the sideograph.
Information on CC Zain astrodynes can be obtained from :-
http://www.light.org/catalog.htm
which contains a list of courses which may be of interest. The one
you are interested in is the book on stellar healings and progressing
the horoscope. A more specific book about astrodyne without any
specific application to any branch of astrology is the handbook on
Astrodynes. Please note it's not an easy task trying to incorporate
the calculation of astrodynes on progression.
> re:Bradley indicator. Correct me if I am wrong but as I remember he
> simply took the sines of the heliocentric longitudes
Standard Bradley does not consider heliocentric positions although
modified Bradley does.
Refer to the booklet for computation details. Your treatment of these
aspects is incorrect.
On the topic of Mean of Five, you will not have any problems with
discontinuity if before you add them together you adjust for the
360 to 0 degrees crossover for each individual planet, .eg take
the delta and it to a running total. Remember Mean of Five merely
produces an artificial object. Once you have the figure for MOF
you can then choose to plot it continously or as 0 to
360 degrees. No plunge as you describe it.
> Sort of a
> circular discontinuity that is inherent in that form of accounting for
> rotary motion.
True only if you are thinking in circles! But if you treat it as
distance then you won't have the problem.
Clement
maposnak wrote:
>
> re:Bradley indicator. Correct me if I am wrong but as I remember he
> simply took the sines of the heliocentric longitudes of the planets
> and added them together as a composite sine wave. So for example if
> all the planets were conjunct at 90 deg longitude. You would get the
> highest value possible for the bradley indicator a +9. If Mer and
> Venus were at 0 or 180 deg with all 7 of the other planets at 90 the
> Bradley idicator would be +7. If all nine were at 270 deg the Bradley
> indicator would be at -9. If 1 were at 225 deg and 8 at 270deg you
> would get -8.707. I kinda remember a computation of a composite sine
> wave for the 36 helio aspects of the 9 planets. (By the way does
> anyone remember the formula for calculating the number as aspects
> between say n planets?(or n anything) I remember seeing it in a book
> on statistics. I can count them for 4 easily. A to B, A to C, A to D,
> B to C, B to D, and finally C to D for a total of 6. )
> I don't remember if Bradley weighted the planets by mass or perhaps
> radius vector. Perhaps he used geo.
> It seemed to me Gann used the mean of five planets simply adding
> together the helio longitudes of the planets. Of course when one
> planet moves from 359 to 0 deg the average takes a plunge. Sort of a
> circular discontinuity that is inherent in that form of accounting for
> rotary motion.
> George
|