|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>re:Bradley indicator. Correct me if I am wrong but as I
remember he simply took the sines of the heliocentric longitudes of the planets
and added them together as a composite sine wave. So for example if all the
planets were conjunct at 90 deg longitude. You would get the highest value
possible for the bradley indicator a +9. If Mer and Venus were at 0 or 180 deg
with all 7 of the other planets at 90 the Bradley idicator would be +7. If all
nine were at 270 deg the Bradley indicator would be at -9. If 1 were at 225 deg
and 8 at 270deg you would get -8.707. I kinda remember a computation of a
composite sine wave for the 36 helio aspects of the 9 planets. (By the way does
anyone remember the formula for calculating the number as aspects between say n
planets?(or n anything) I remember seeing it in a book on statistics. I can
count them for 4 easily. A to B, A to C, A to D, B to C, B to D, and finally C
to D for a total of 6. ) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I don't remember if Bradley weighted the planets by mass or
perhaps radius vector. Perhaps he used geo. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It seemed to me Gann used the mean of five planets simply
adding together the helio longitudes of the planets. Of course when one planet
moves from 359 to 0 deg the average takes a plunge. Sort of a circular
discontinuity that is inherent in that form of accounting for rotary
motion.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>George</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jul 25 11:01:37 1998
Received: from list.listserver.com (198.68.191.15)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 6222
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 13:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with SMTP id KAA09985;
Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prefetch-atm.san.rr.com (ns1.san.rr.com [204.210.0.2])
by accessone.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/PIH) with ESMTP id KAA09798
for <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p6 (dt0b0nef.san.rr.com [204.210.50.239])
by prefetch-atm.san.rr.com (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA00758;
Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980725101557.0093d100@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:15:59 -0700
Reply-To: mailbox@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Renate Muldowney <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bonds
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: asears@xxxxxxxx, RealTraders Discussion Group <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: mailbox@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Alan,
Lines are drawn from possible and probable pivot points according to rules
I was given.
This technique combines lagging and leading indicators.
At 09:23 AM 7/25/98 -0400, Alan Sears wrote:
>
>
>>Phillip
>>I sold today, the X is why after other things telling me
>>a strong down move is likely
>
>
>Where are these lines drawn from and why ?
>Are they Babson lines ?
>
>
>
>
|