|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes thats right. We were on the beta tester team and located over 50 bugs.
Not just like dumbass bugs people here talk about. I am talking serious
internal problems. Its code is very inefficient it is extremely slow. SO
slow, I hate to tell more F***ing slow than TS. Infact in some operations we
discovered it was so slow even on a dual 550 (which was the highest
processor at the time). Their managment (yes S) told us to keep it SHUT with
the speed issues. Take my word its just another badly designed software
wanna be.
Yes I was very excited at the time. I had a lot of respect for these guys
but they F*ed up BIG. And the reality is non of the have the skills it takes
(mangment and integrity) to bring a product like that to the market.
As for all the wanna be traders on the list looking for that Magicware
software thats going to make you rich. Read my lips.
If you havent made so far with omega you will never make it as a trader. 95%
of all of you on this list are going to lose your ass no matter what you do
or use and no amount software is going to help. ( Yes you all know this)
Thats the way it is. You will be a lot better off buying property or wait on
second thoughts keep at it some has to pay for my yachts upkeeping.
Mr. N
Tradeware sucks like Omega but I still make money everyday.
----- Original Message -----
From: "WParks" <parks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <I4Lothian@xxxxxxx>; < >
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: Omega or Traderware???
> >Looking forward, not backwards, is there something that
> > this group can think of to utilize Traderware.
> >
> > As I stated before, I have been told that Mark Brown has no legal
interest
> in
> > the software. Traderware the company is dissolved. Traderware the
> software
> > is owned by Steve Yates and Masterpiece Software.
>
> As one who purchased an original copy of Traderware, I take offense that
> Charles Hargrave and Steve Yates have not live up to their promises of
> before. What about those who "believed" in them 2 years ago? They left us
> high and dry and quite frankly are no better than the Cruz brothers. Only
> difference is they dissolved their company and Omega's not quite there
yet.
>
> However, if they are now coming forward to those original purchasers and
> saying, look guys, we want to make good on our word and product. Where do
> we need to go with this and what can we do to make things right, then
> perhaps enough of a common opinion could be formed to give some direction.
> If they're just looking for more capital, then I don't need to travel down
> that path again. History has taught us that they'll take the money and
run.
> If you want to improve the product and sell me an upgrade, I'll first want
> to see what's been fixed, improved and changed and then see how much you
> want to sock us for it. Gee now that I think about it, wasn't the original
> license good for 3 years and probably due to expire soon? How convenient
to
> resurrect this now.
>
> BTW I would also vote for alternative feeds (i.e. UMDS). Internet feeds
may
> be great if your in downtown Chicago with a T3, but in rural America with
> PPP, it just doesn't feed the bulldog. We're traders and this is our
> business; we're not hobbyist.
|