|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jimmy:
I tried Pro and decided against it because it did not have realtime volume
indicatos,
which I use, and omega had no idea when they would have them.
Marcelo
----- Original Message -----
From: Jimmy <jsnowden@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Randy <rdsmith5@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:58 PM
Subject: RE:sp6 still crashes
> Randy,
>
> I am running a dual processor Dell with Windows 2000 and TS2k SP5. I
> crashed Ts2k Wednesday. I use it pretty hard but not as hard as some.
> Pieces of the program just disappear. One example is the sound scheme.
> Alerts quit sounding as the whole area in Windows for TS2k sounds is just
> gone. The charting screen just goes white. This is the same bug as SP1
> though not nearly so bad. Indicators do not update correctly. Parts of
> lines just go away and come back. On and on. Pro does many of the same
> things. Pro is nice. I like it however are you going to trust
Tradestation
> for data. We trusted them when TS2k was released two years ago and the
> first year was a nightmare and we still have bugs.
>
> Jimmy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy [mailto:rdsmith5@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:10 PM
> To: ztrader
> Cc: omega-list
> Subject: Re: TS2000 sp6
>
>
> Just an interesting observation . Given all the known and apparent bugs
in
> TS2K and the wide range of users. Why is their experience
> with TS2K so different.
> Not unlike others on this list I had multiple crashes on Win 98 but just
> over
> 1 year ago I switched to W2K and TS has never crashed
> running real time and trading everyday. Yet others with probably the same
> hardware setup and datafeed would report problems. I'm
> making no claims or excuses for the software just a question .
>
> Regards
> Randy Smith
>
>
> ztrader wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2001, 12:29:07 PM, Wayne Mathews wrote:
> >
> > WM> Omega not having issued sp6 to fix the (last) remaining bugs in
TS2000
> >
> > I don't use TS2k real time because it is so unstable. Nevertheless, I
> > have done quite a lot of 'development' work with it. In my
> > experience, there are a **LOT** of remaining bugs, some of which make
> > TS crash on a regular basis. It might be a lot of work to fix all
> > these.
> >
> > WM> must be a result of putting all their programmers on to TS Pro.
> >
> > Perhaps so, and perhaps the TS2k programmers might not be there any
> > more.
> >
> > WM> I know this is a bad precedent,
> >
> > It is, indeed. We might end up paying for the SAME level of "support"
> > we have had so far. Besides, this might just be another revenue source
> > for Pro or other Omega development - or even more marketing. Who's to
> > say it would be used for TS2k? :-)
> >
> > WM> but this should be the last service pack
> > WM> for TS2000 and this looks like the only way it will happen.
> >
> > Given the large number of bugs, it would seem we have quite a ways to
> > go. TS4 went to 25+. Why would it be be much less for the more complex
> > TS2k?
> >
> > ztrader
>
>
|