[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE:sp6 still crashes



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Randy,

I am running a dual processor Dell with Windows 2000 and TS2k SP5.  I
crashed Ts2k Wednesday.  I use it pretty hard but not as hard as some.
Pieces of the program just disappear.  One example is the sound scheme.
Alerts quit sounding as the whole area in Windows for TS2k sounds is just
gone.  The charting screen just goes white.  This is the same bug as SP1
though not nearly so bad.  Indicators do not update correctly.  Parts of
lines just go away and come back.  On and on.  Pro does many of the same
things.  Pro is nice.  I like it however are you going to trust Tradestation
for data.  We trusted them when TS2k was released two years ago and the
first year was a nightmare and we still have bugs.

Jimmy


-----Original Message-----
From: Randy [mailto:rdsmith5@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:10 PM
To: ztrader
Cc: omega-list
Subject: Re: TS2000 sp6


Just an interesting observation . Given all the  known and apparent bugs in
TS2K and the wide range of users. Why is their experience
with TS2K so different.
Not unlike others on this list I had multiple crashes on Win 98 but just
over
1 year ago I switched to W2K and TS has never  crashed
running real time and trading everyday. Yet others with probably the same
hardware setup and datafeed would report problems. I'm
making no claims or excuses for the software just a question .

Regards
Randy Smith


ztrader wrote:

> On Thursday, March 15, 2001, 12:29:07 PM, Wayne Mathews wrote:
>
> WM> Omega not having issued sp6 to fix the (last) remaining bugs in TS2000
>
> I don't use TS2k real time because it is so unstable. Nevertheless, I
> have done quite a lot of 'development' work with it. In my
> experience, there are a **LOT** of remaining bugs, some of which make
> TS crash on a regular basis. It might be a lot of work to fix all
> these.
>
> WM> must be a result of putting all their programmers on to TS Pro.
>
> Perhaps so, and perhaps the TS2k programmers might not be there any
> more.
>
> WM> I know this is a bad precedent,
>
> It is, indeed. We might end up paying for the SAME level of "support"
> we have had so far. Besides, this might just be another revenue source
> for Pro or other Omega development - or even more marketing. Who's to
> say it would be used for TS2k? :-)
>
> WM> but this should be the last service pack
> WM> for TS2000 and this looks like the only way it will happen.
>
> Given the large number of bugs, it would seem we have quite a ways to
> go. TS4 went to 25+. Why would it be be much less for the more complex
> TS2k?
>
> ztrader