|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Just an interesting observation . Given all the known and apparent bugs in
TS2K and the wide range of users. Why is their experience
with TS2K so different.
Not unlike others on this list I had multiple crashes on Win 98 but just over
1 year ago I switched to W2K and TS has never crashed
running real time and trading everyday. Yet others with probably the same
hardware setup and datafeed would report problems. I'm
making no claims or excuses for the software just a question .
Regards
Randy Smith
ztrader wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2001, 12:29:07 PM, Wayne Mathews wrote:
>
> WM> Omega not having issued sp6 to fix the (last) remaining bugs in TS2000
>
> I don't use TS2k real time because it is so unstable. Nevertheless, I
> have done quite a lot of 'development' work with it. In my
> experience, there are a **LOT** of remaining bugs, some of which make
> TS crash on a regular basis. It might be a lot of work to fix all
> these.
>
> WM> must be a result of putting all their programmers on to TS Pro.
>
> Perhaps so, and perhaps the TS2k programmers might not be there any
> more.
>
> WM> I know this is a bad precedent,
>
> It is, indeed. We might end up paying for the SAME level of "support"
> we have had so far. Besides, this might just be another revenue source
> for Pro or other Omega development - or even more marketing. Who's to
> say it would be used for TS2k? :-)
>
> WM> but this should be the last service pack
> WM> for TS2000 and this looks like the only way it will happen.
>
> Given the large number of bugs, it would seem we have quite a ways to
> go. TS4 went to 25+. Why would it be be much less for the more complex
> TS2k?
>
> ztrader
|