|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> "I don't buy for a second the
> BMI claim that they can't add bandwidth."
>
> I'll go even one further: I bet they slow it intentionally.
NOT BAD CALL !
DBC gone worse on SAT here and tell you they cant do anything about it as
they channel their resources into Esignal : "GO THERE " <g>
Wouldnt wonder that BMI has the same attitude
rgds hans
What ever
> happened to BMI's brand new 56K V-Line before DBC bought BMI out? I
> remember having to back down to 36.6 after DBC got their grimy ass hands
> on it.
>
> Riddle me that DBC, you fn crooks!
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dennis Holverstott [mailto:dennis@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 1:18 PM
> > To: Omega List
> > Subject: Comstock and quote.com
> >
> >
> > Riddle me this. :-) Everyone seems to praise Comstock as a "premium"
> > data feed and everyone ridicules quote.com's obviously crummy EOD data.
> > Problem is quote.com gets their crummy data from Comstock. So is
> > Comstock really any good or does everyone just assume it is because it
> > costs so much? Will tradestation.com have the same crummy EOD data as
> > quote.com?
> >
> > ps - sorry TJ but I'll take realtime quote.com tick data for the e-mini
> > over BMI any day. You must have lousy internet service to be so critical
> > of quote.com. It ain't perfect but, on balance, it's a better tick feed
> > than BMI.
> >
> > pps - I'll second the hope that DTN doesn't go away. They are a Bridge
> > feed which seems to have better EOD data than Comstock and they have
> > enough bandwidth to handle all the ticks. I don't buy for a second the
> > BMI claim that they can't add bandwidth. They just want to force
> > everybody to use E-Signal cuz it's cheaper and easier for them. Problem
> > is there are better internet feeds than E-Signal so it's lose/lose for
> > DBC and BMI.
> >
> > --
> > Dennis
> >
>
|