|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tom:
You are certianly welcome to treat people as you see fit.
But I respect the privacy of others. You're trying to make
your case by speaking of terms cloaked in lawerese?
Expectations of privacy? My word is my bond. I respect
others, even if they show no respect for me. When I drag
myself down to the gutter to re-act in the manner they have
treated me, I have only cheapened myself.
The old saying goes something like when you put something
into writing, just expect it will be published for all the
world to see? How about...Treat others as you'd wish to be
treated...
When I send a private email, I do expect it to remain
private.
Best,
Tim Morge
"Thomas J. Vetter" wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> If you send an email to someone with whom you do not have a private/personal
> relationship, then there can be no expectation of privacy -- unless the
> receiver has otherwise agreed to such a condition of receiving email or
> other communications. The receiver of unsolicited information always has
> the right to make it public for any reason.
>
> Tom Vetter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Morge <tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: John Sweeney S&C <JSweeney@xxxxxxxxxxx>; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 1:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Here's why Mark is mad at S&C!
>
> >John:
> >
> >I'm not singling you out--your email post here just happened
> >to be the latest example posted...Let me ask a question of
> >you and the other people that post and read the list:
> >
> >There have been many posts to this list recently that at
> >least on the surface appear to be posting emails they
> >recieved *privately* and then posting a *public* reply to
> >the emails. Another recent example of this would be the back
> >and forth email/postings between Robyn G. and the owner of
> >CSI and the dispute over payment by check for services
> >rendered.
> >
> >Why are people posting and quoting these personal emails to
> >this list? I anticipate that the most common response will
> >be as a form of retaliation, as in, 'He started it! I am
> >only protecting my own name or getting my side told!'
> >
> >But does anyone here really think this makes sense? When I
> >write someone a private email, I expect it to remain
> >private, unless they ask permission to post a portion of it
> >to a newsgroup. Period. No exceptions. Retaliation or
> >'getting my side heard' would not be a valid excuse in my
> >opinion, and even if I felt I had been wronged, I would not
> >post someone elses private email to me on a public forum
> >without their permission.
> >
> >Am I the only person that values privacy and respects other
> >people's privacy? I even respect the privacy of the people I
> >disagree [strongly] with.
> >
> >Tim Morge
> >
> >John Sweeney S&C wrote:
> >>
> >> I told Mark to send in Traderware when it was ready for review. I got
> back
> >> this (my reply is at the end):
> >>
> >> >no see we did that with our MARKET PROFILE for TS and you guys even told
> us
> >> >you were putting it in the next issue when he called. Rich or I one
> have
> >> >the email from your guy who stating this. Then guess what it never
> appeared
> >> >and still hasn't to this day. But in spite of that we have sold
> hundreds of
> >> >it http://24.0.100.173/mb/profile.htm and it has been a great benefit
> to
> >> >many but you don't care about anything but advertising dollars and
> pleasing
> >> >your big boss Bill Cruz.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> More power to you. When you've got it in shrinkwrap, send it off to us
> for
> >> >review here (not meant hostilely). That's the same deal we offer every
> >> >vendor.
> >> >
> >> >Yea bull corn, tried it read above it doesn't work. No ad money = no
> >> >review...that's the way it is the readers get an inbreed point of view
> and
> >> >that's it. Anyone who would accept ads like some of the ones I have
> seen
> >> >has no morals or ethics..you included prove me wrong.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> >http://24.0.100.173/traderwarex/show1.gif
> >>
> >> Reply: I've done 95% of the reviews since 1990. How about sending me the
> >> email you refer to? I'll try to find out what happened.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> John Sweeney, Tech. Editor Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities
> >> Technical Analysis, Inc. The Traders' Magazine
> >> 4757 California Ave. S.W. Phone: 206 938-0570 Fax: 206 938-1307
> >> Seattle, WA 98116-4499 USA Web: http://www.traders.com/
> >> ____________________________________________________________________
> >> Contents may not reflect official opinion of Technical Analysis, Inc.
> >
|
