|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tim,
You are right that you should respect to privacy of others, as I do, but
when someone sends you an email, it is no longer private, unless you have a
relationship or agreement otherwise. That's just the way it is.
I understand your position, and you can abide by it.
Best,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morge <tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Thomas J. Vetter <tjvetter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Here's why Mark is mad at S&C!
>Tom:
>
>You are certianly welcome to treat people as you see fit.
>But I respect the privacy of others. You're trying to make
>your case by speaking of terms cloaked in lawerese?
>Expectations of privacy? My word is my bond. I respect
>others, even if they show no respect for me. When I drag
>myself down to the gutter to re-act in the manner they have
>treated me, I have only cheapened myself.
>
>The old saying goes something like when you put something
>into writing, just expect it will be published for all the
>world to see? How about...Treat others as you'd wish to be
>treated...
>
>When I send a private email, I do expect it to remain
>private.
>
>Best,
>
>Tim Morge
>
>"Thomas J. Vetter" wrote:
>>
>> Tim,
>>
>> If you send an email to someone with whom you do not have a
private/personal
>> relationship, then there can be no expectation of privacy -- unless the
>> receiver has otherwise agreed to such a condition of receiving email or
>> other communications. The receiver of unsolicited information always has
>> the right to make it public for any reason.
>>
>> Tom Vetter
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Timothy Morge <tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: John Sweeney S&C <JSweeney@xxxxxxxxxxx>; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 1:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: Here's why Mark is mad at S&C!
>>
>> >John:
>> >
>> >I'm not singling you out--your email post here just happened
>> >to be the latest example posted...Let me ask a question of
>> >you and the other people that post and read the list:
>> >
>> >There have been many posts to this list recently that at
>> >least on the surface appear to be posting emails they
>> >recieved *privately* and then posting a *public* reply to
>> >the emails. Another recent example of this would be the back
>> >and forth email/postings between Robyn G. and the owner of
>> >CSI and the dispute over payment by check for services
>> >rendered.
>> >
>> >Why are people posting and quoting these personal emails to
>> >this list? I anticipate that the most common response will
>> >be as a form of retaliation, as in, 'He started it! I am
>> >only protecting my own name or getting my side told!'
>> >
>> >But does anyone here really think this makes sense? When I
>> >write someone a private email, I expect it to remain
>> >private, unless they ask permission to post a portion of it
>> >to a newsgroup. Period. No exceptions. Retaliation or
>> >'getting my side heard' would not be a valid excuse in my
>> >opinion, and even if I felt I had been wronged, I would not
>> >post someone elses private email to me on a public forum
>> >without their permission.
>> >
>> >Am I the only person that values privacy and respects other
>> >people's privacy? I even respect the privacy of the people I
>> >disagree [strongly] with.
>> >
>> >Tim Morge
>> >
>> >John Sweeney S&C wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I told Mark to send in Traderware when it was ready for review. I got
>> back
>> >> this (my reply is at the end):
>> >>
>> >> >no see we did that with our MARKET PROFILE for TS and you guys even
told
>> us
>> >> >you were putting it in the next issue when he called. Rich or I one
>> have
>> >> >the email from your guy who stating this. Then guess what it never
>> appeared
>> >> >and still hasn't to this day. But in spite of that we have sold
>> hundreds of
>> >> >it http://24.0.100.173/mb/profile.htm and it has been a great
benefit
>> to
>> >> >many but you don't care about anything but advertising dollars and
>> pleasing
>> >> >your big boss Bill Cruz.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> More power to you. When you've got it in shrinkwrap, send it off to
us
>> for
>> >> >review here (not meant hostilely). That's the same deal we offer
every
>> >> >vendor.
>> >> >
>> >> >Yea bull corn, tried it read above it doesn't work. No ad money =
no
>> >> >review...that's the way it is the readers get an inbreed point of
view
>> and
>> >> >that's it. Anyone who would accept ads like some of the ones I have
>> seen
>> >> >has no morals or ethics..you included prove me wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >http://24.0.100.173/traderwarex/show1.gif
>> >>
>> >> Reply: I've done 95% of the reviews since 1990. How about sending me
the
>> >> email you refer to? I'll try to find out what happened.
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >> John Sweeney, Tech. Editor Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities
>> >> Technical Analysis, Inc. The Traders' Magazine
>> >> 4757 California Ave. S.W. Phone: 206 938-0570 Fax: 206 938-1307
>> >> Seattle, WA 98116-4499 USA Web: http://www.traders.com/
>> >> ____________________________________________________________________
>> >> Contents may not reflect official opinion of Technical Analysis, Inc.
>> >
|
