|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tim,
If you send an email to someone with whom you do not have a private/personal
relationship, then there can be no expectation of privacy -- unless the
receiver has otherwise agreed to such a condition of receiving email or
other communications. The receiver of unsolicited information always has
the right to make it public for any reason.
Tom Vetter
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morge <tmorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: John Sweeney S&C <JSweeney@xxxxxxxxxxx>; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
<omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: Here's why Mark is mad at S&C!
>John:
>
>I'm not singling you out--your email post here just happened
>to be the latest example posted...Let me ask a question of
>you and the other people that post and read the list:
>
>There have been many posts to this list recently that at
>least on the surface appear to be posting emails they
>recieved *privately* and then posting a *public* reply to
>the emails. Another recent example of this would be the back
>and forth email/postings between Robyn G. and the owner of
>CSI and the dispute over payment by check for services
>rendered.
>
>Why are people posting and quoting these personal emails to
>this list? I anticipate that the most common response will
>be as a form of retaliation, as in, 'He started it! I am
>only protecting my own name or getting my side told!'
>
>But does anyone here really think this makes sense? When I
>write someone a private email, I expect it to remain
>private, unless they ask permission to post a portion of it
>to a newsgroup. Period. No exceptions. Retaliation or
>'getting my side heard' would not be a valid excuse in my
>opinion, and even if I felt I had been wronged, I would not
>post someone elses private email to me on a public forum
>without their permission.
>
>Am I the only person that values privacy and respects other
>people's privacy? I even respect the privacy of the people I
>disagree [strongly] with.
>
>Tim Morge
>
>John Sweeney S&C wrote:
>>
>> I told Mark to send in Traderware when it was ready for review. I got
back
>> this (my reply is at the end):
>>
>> >no see we did that with our MARKET PROFILE for TS and you guys even told
us
>> >you were putting it in the next issue when he called. Rich or I one
have
>> >the email from your guy who stating this. Then guess what it never
appeared
>> >and still hasn't to this day. But in spite of that we have sold
hundreds of
>> >it http://24.0.100.173/mb/profile.htm and it has been a great benefit
to
>> >many but you don't care about anything but advertising dollars and
pleasing
>> >your big boss Bill Cruz.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> More power to you. When you've got it in shrinkwrap, send it off to us
for
>> >review here (not meant hostilely). That's the same deal we offer every
>> >vendor.
>> >
>> >Yea bull corn, tried it read above it doesn't work. No ad money = no
>> >review...that's the way it is the readers get an inbreed point of view
and
>> >that's it. Anyone who would accept ads like some of the ones I have
seen
>> >has no morals or ethics..you included prove me wrong.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >http://24.0.100.173/traderwarex/show1.gif
>>
>> Reply: I've done 95% of the reviews since 1990. How about sending me the
>> email you refer to? I'll try to find out what happened.
>>
>> John
>>
>> John Sweeney, Tech. Editor Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities
>> Technical Analysis, Inc. The Traders' Magazine
>> 4757 California Ave. S.W. Phone: 206 938-0570 Fax: 206 938-1307
>> Seattle, WA 98116-4499 USA Web: http://www.traders.com/
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>> Contents may not reflect official opinion of Technical Analysis, Inc.
>
|
