|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I run TS2000i on NT & Compared it to Win98 - and on a fast machine PII300
w/256meg ram or greater there isn't much difference but on my P200 w/80 meg
ram I was losing about 10% of the ticks on the S&P with Win 98, on NT4 w/20x
symbols (that's right, 500 symbols vs 25) I lost no ticks!- NT4 manages
resources better I guess. NT4 is just more difficult for the average guy to
set up, plus much higher cost. But after trying both, I'm staying with NT4.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Courchene <positionsize@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega list <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: TS2000i Stability
>--- "Joshua P. Hill" <joshhill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I don't mean to defend Tradestaton--but why are
>> people running this
>> stuff on Windows 98 rather than NT?
>
>
>I upgraded to NT4.0(sp3 and sp4 tried both) from
>Win98. I saw NO improvement in PS2000i performance AT
>ALL.
>
>Alan
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Fenstemaker <dfens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: omegalist <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 11:05 PM
>> Subject: TS2000i Stability
>>
>>
>> > This product is awesome. Even though I only have
>> > 256 Meg of memory, and a 350 YM_M4I5S3S_10
>YM_M4I5S3S_11, and I stress
>> > the system by collecting realtime data on one
>> > symbol, its sometimes runs as long as 2 hours
>> > before it crashes. It won't shutdown. Not even
>> with
>> > a task shutdown force. Hit the reset, have your
>> > disk checked, and start all over.
>> >
>> > Just how is someone supposed to trade with this
>> product?
>> >
>> > Is anybody going to go to Omega World and listen
>> > to what has to be misrepresentation?
>> >
>> > Is anybody, like TASC or Future's going to have
>> the
>> > guts to say anything?
>> >
>> > If anyone wants to start a class action suit let
>> me know.
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>>
>>
>
|