|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Russ,
You made some excellent points. Serves me right for trying to use such a
simple anology to describe my thoughts.
Although, in the end, (and as you indicated) the solution is the same for
any of us... if the tool does not do the job, whether discovered sooner or
later ...and... as long as there is another suitable tool, out goes the
defective one.
If there is no other suitable tool, I guess we learn to live with the one we
have, learning it's strengths and weaknesses, and learning "safe" ways to
use it successfully.
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TWA7663@xxxxxxx [mailto:TWA7663@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 11:51 AM
> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Omega Record Revenues And 51% Increase In Income
>
>
> In a message dated 4/22/99 10:41:34 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> doug@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << This is rocket science, eh?
>
> (disclaimer: I like Craftsman tools, it was just a dumb example)
>
> Doug >>
>
>
> It takes only a couple of hours to determine if your craftsman tools are
> working but it may take more than 30 days ( typical money back period) to
> determine if the pain is worth the gain of TS. It depends upon
> your needs.
> If you discover this after the money back period you are angrier
> at the time
> that has been wasted more than the price. BTW, it was over a
> year of my time
> and literally 10s of thousands of programming costs before I
> realized all the
> limitations and bugs of TS. If I had known this from the
> beginning, I would
> have developed a trading tool using VB and Excel and had a better
> product by
> far for "my" needs but Omega convinced me otherwise at the time
> of purchase.
> By the time I arrived at this conclusion, I had so much time and money
> invested I just kept investing more to keep from losing that first year's
> investment. (Lousy trading method). And now TS2000 has a slug of more
> problems. I am seriously revisiting my Excel idea.
>
> Russ
>
|