|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dans un courrier daté du 25/03/99 22:38:51 Heure d10iver Pari51 Madrid,
markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
<< Surely you are not going to let Mr. Gold be completely alone in defending
Omegas latest "improved" software? Or did you secure a real time data feed
and experience this thing for yourself? How will you be able to keep a
strait face and talk at Omega World? That is with such a silly clown as
Bill and Ralph Cruz as a role model?
Warm and Fuzziest Regaurds,
Mark Brown
>>
Beeeh.. I'm still at the same place, behind a keyboard and working hard as
usual.
Due to the fact that I do not run TS2000i realtime yet, I have nothing to say.
When I do not know about something, I shut up.
You should try once, it works fine for anyone.
People seems to have various and opposed opinions on the new TS2000i realtime,
and the setup problems seems to exist with the help of 2000 versions from
Microsoft beta products.
As for now, I will not say anything more.
The beta reports that I currently read seems to show that things are going
into the right direction.
I'll not say that no problem could exist, but it'sdifficult for me to make an
opinion.
Speaking of time, I have not enough to spend on Cray machine internal
structure, and I'm more interested into a palmtop computer that should be
enough to run the new version of the neurofuzzy Assistant.
What makes a difference in your philosophy and ours is that you think that the
power has the answer. Maybe by using of the "20th century brute force "(
this is the case for most of the products currently available: hill climbing
optimisation, genetic algorithms, neural nets with walk forward training and
testing).
My point is very different: We attempt to use the power of the computer with
some intelligence behind. This resides in some smart coding for what a small
palmtop computer will be enough to produce results that you could maybe
achieve with a Cray machine.
For your information, I should be able to present some new concept regarding
to neurofuzzy logic: We are now able to use a system as is ( produced by
anything , anyone you want), and automatically improve the results by running
it into the neurofuzzy software.
This means that unlike what has been done until now, this software is able to
build trading system from any indicator set, able to retrain it realtime
during the market, but also able to improve any written system in some seconds
or minutes.
On a palmtop computer.
FYI, I do not trade because of what I have explained, but my sytems are traded
by someone.
The current performance is as for today 280% since 04/28/98.
You may call this a track record or not. I do not care and wish you the same
at a minimum.
What I'll present will certainly be something that you have never seen before:
A workshop where the attendee will choose the indicators thta we will use to
build a system using these methods.
No way to play the game wrong under these conditions.
Concerning models to follow or not, I have no hints or idea.
I know of what I speak, and confident enough to rely only on myself.
The problem is not related to TradeStation or whatever you want: I could be
able to run the system on anything you want, Excel included.
I only find TradeStation convenient for programming and running trading
systems.
Be careful with your feet when reassemblying your Cray machine: some parts
seems heavy to manipulate, and an accident is so stupid...
Rgds,
Pierre Orphelin
www.sirtrade.com
|