[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: y2K woes & omega



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hey Mr I know Everything UMCane.
Go back from where you came your full of BS and you got no manners.
Omega owes the clients an answer to a question about Y2K patch.
Its a question of common courtesy.

Robert



 UMCANE01@xxxxxxx wrote:
>In a message dated 10/26/1998 2:47:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
fritz@xxxxxxxx
>writes:
>
><< If you think the date format is the only thing involved in Y2K 
> compliance, then it's clear you don't have the faintest understanding 
> of the problem.  I suggest you stop making authoritative statements 
> on subjects you know little about. >>
>
>
>Did I say that that was ALL that needed to be DONE??? I could go on and on
>about how testing in Win95 must be handled. For instance when in a Y2K
testing
>environment one must make sure the hardware which includes the pc's BIOS must
>be compliant. BUT I don't choose to go on and on about computer related
>material unless challenged on it (which what has been happening)
> 
>I prefer to read and discuss T-R-A-D-I-N-G which from this so called "list"
>has left me with a bad taste in my mouth because of all the b*tching that has
>taken place on this list since I joined 2 years ago. You see, this is exactly
>why Omega probably closed down their AOL and BBS sites because it was
>counterproductive. Well, watch, it's probably gonna happen to this list as
>well. Although I hope it doesn't because a lot of the Trading discussions are
>really informative and interesting.
>
>UMCANE01
>
>