[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:Searching the Starr report



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Nope this is it, if he had something other than sex we wouldn't have to
deal with this sex scandal now.
The Starr report was written and designed to embarrass the President and
turn public opinion.
He was successful at embarrassing the president but there is nothing
criminal here just sinful.
Public opinion is still high for Clinton to stay despite this ugly attempt
to change it. Just think if we had done this to President Reagan with Iran
Contra or President Bush with the S&L's. The Clinton's personal life
argument and this sex report was done to show patterns is total BS on the
independent council's part. You need to find something after spending over
40 million bucks of the tax payers money. Like the Vietnam war, Johnson,
Nixon and now Starr, Clinton we learn. America is still a young country and
we learn from these events. Now that the issue of the independent councils
powers or known and the abuse on morality in the office of the President
both will be more defined in the future. Thing is discovery is good and the
American people can handle what ever. Sometimes leadership and morality
have different paths so decide you wont a saint or a leader. Sure we all
want both but do you think getting the most powerful job in the world
attracts both. Its like it was quoted said by someone "its the economy
stupid". Time to move on and take the next trade and give the country a
break we don't need this impeachment stuff. I think both men were not
thinking of their country Starr and Clinton both were to concerned with self.

Robert


At 03:27 PM 9/12/98 -0400, Sentinel Trading wrote:
>You didn't read the introduction, Starr is not done nor is the grand jury.
This
>is only a side issue that was investigated to document the behavior
patterns of 
>the Clintons', What will the markets do if indictments are handed down. And
>further White Water issues are brought to conclusion.
>
>____________________Reply Separator____________________
>Subject: Searching the Starr report
>Author: Patrick Gamble
>Date:  9/12/98 2:25 AM
>
>The word I can't find in the Starr report is not 'cigar' or 'nuts' but
>'Whitewater'.
>
>
>
>
>