|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree that Fat32 is an improvement over Fat16, but most machines purchased
in the past 18-24 months have it anyway. Before upgrading to '98, I would
check to see if a machine already has Fat32, then consider whether or not it
is worth risking the other possible problems that might be encountered.
An alternative to the Multi-Monitor issue is a 3rd party board, such as
ColorGraphics-- it doesn't tie up the resources that Win-98 Multi-Monitor
Support does and will drive up to 4 monitors-- but, it is more expensive.
____________________________________
At 02:40 PM 8/8/98 +0100, you wrote:
>I've upgraded and it is definitely much better than Win95, IMO.
>
>Fat32 saves disc space, many applications are faster and I have
>fewer crashes. I'm using the multiple monitor feature and it works
>fine.
>
>My only glitch during upgrade was a failure to recognise my
>modem automatically, but it was easy to manually choose it from
>the modem driver list.
>
>Much recommended.
>
>
>
>
>
|