|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Craig
Well spotted. I tested my code and it worked fine because I NEVER use a
"minimum" bars exploration. About 400 works well for me and my 'Test'
exploration is left set to that. I've lost count of the times I've suggested
that folk take care with EMA's. I guess SAR is one that fits a slightly
different category but must have more than "minimum". I imagine Cross() will
only force 2 bars to be checked if used with just SAR. Your solution is
spot-on.
Roy
----- Original Message -----
From: <craigdehaan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: [Metastockusers] Re: Exploration
> RH,
> In one of the exploration columns or in the filter itself add a
> condition such as Ref(C,-50)>0 that will force evaluation of data for
> a number of periods. The SAR function used in an exploration needs
> more than minimum data loading to output results.
>
> --- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Robin Hood" <robinhood@xxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hi, I've problems with this very simple exploration
> >
> > Col A: Buy
> > Cross(L,SAR(0.02,0.2))
> >
> > Col B: Sell
> > Cross(SAR(0.02,0.2),H)
> >
> > Filter
> > (VOLUME*C)>400000
> >
> > The filter is for Italian Market (Euro)
> >
> >
> > The fact is that I tried to divide the exploration in order to have
> one for Buy and one for Sell separately.
> > So, I've found that the report offers the same results for each
> exploration :-O
> >
> > I've done some basic error or my metastock 7.2 is drunk?
> >
> >
> > Robin
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|