|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
You cannot reply to this message via email because you have chosen not
to disclose your email address to the group. Please use this
page to reply.
somewhere I read some good advice re Experts
whereas it's best to make a binary first to see exactly where the hits are, not
where you ask for them to be, without proving it, very good
advice.
In making a new expert, I started out with a simple
setup-- MACD(dema) <0 but the
results turned out poorly. the stock price was about 23c
, which should not make any difference to the scan.
Data Window actual results--- the end of 1 group and start
of the next
<FONT face=Arial
size=2>
-.000526 .002076
.004368
.004244
.003855
-.000950
bar 1/
ok 2/ signal-wrong 3/signal-wrong
4/signal wrong 5/ no
signal 6/ no signal--should
be
<FONT face=Arial
size=2>
missed from next set
so bar 2-4 should not have had a
signal
bar 1 & 5 were
correct
bar 6 should have
had a signal
how can I tell Metastock to pay more
attention and to try to be a bit more accurate !!!
there must be a way to do
this, cutting down the number of decimal points ? maybe
helps
I did read somewhere recently that Metastock
has a lower level of maths capability than some other programs, reason
given was
to save memory (or save money )
look forward to comments
Keith
---Outgoing mail is certified Virus
Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A
href="http://www.grisoft.com";>http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.410 /
Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/02
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
<font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT<img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N879.ameritrade.yahoo/B1054521.11;sz=300x250;adc=ZHS;ord=1036677008?"; alt="" width="300" height="250"
border="0">
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|