[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Metastockusers] MetaStock ADX vs. RealTick ADX



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links











 Traders Resources 






 

The ADX function in the MetaStock (7 and below)  Explorer function
gives whacky results too, 

Warmest Regards
David Hunt________________________________
www.adest.com.au
Phone: Australia:    (02) 9527 4690              Int:            + 61 2  9527 4690
             USA  :        + 1 312 577 0491________________________________
-------Original Message-------
 

From: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:17:25
To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Metastockusers] MetaStock ADX vs. RealTick ADX
 I'm looking at using the ADX to select between a Stochastic and a moving average crossover system as appropriate for trending vs. channeling/cycling conditions.  Can anyone shed some light on the difference between the ADX indicator displayed in RealTick and the ADX function in MetaStock?  When I plot them on the identical price data in the two different software packages, the results are completely different.  The RealTick ADX behaves as I would expect, with significant variations between higher values (> 30 or so) for trending conditions and lower values (< 30 or so) for channeling conditions.  The RealTick ADX line also begins 14 days after the start of the data for a 14-period ADX.  The MetaStock ADX is nearly a flat line, and begins 28 days after the start of the data (for a 14-period ADX).  It looks like it's being smoothed a second time.I've done some investigation but have not yet done a spreadsheet to re-creat Wilder's formulas from his "New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems".  That's my next step, but I thought someone else may have already figured it out.So far it looks to me like it's a difference in terminology - that the ADX in RealTick is actually Wilder's DX, or the MetaStock DX is actually Wilder's ADX.  I also note that MetaStock's custom formula library includes a custom indicator which calculates ADX and ADXR without rounding, with the note that the built-in indicator is exactly the same as Wilder's original calculations.  I wouldn't think that the rounding difference would be large enough to account for the difference between the two software packages.Thanks.Gary To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
 

 


















www.adest.com.auPhone: Australia:      02 9527 4690          Internat'l: +612 9527 4690          USA & Fax:  1 312 577 0491 






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


<font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT<img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N879.ameritrade.yahoo/B1054521.11;sz=300x250;adc=ZHS;ord=1036648405?"; alt="" width="300" height="250"
border="0">









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Attachment: Description: ""