[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Metastockusers] MetaStock ADX vs. RealTick ADX



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links











 Traders Resources 






 

Gary,
 
A Dx would not take 28 days to  appear so its probably not that. 

Warmest Regards
David Hunt________________________________
www.adest.com.au
Phone: Australia:    (02) 9527 4690              Int:            + 61 2  9527 4690
             USA  :        + 1 312 577 0491________________________________
-------Original Message-------
 

From: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:17:25
To: Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Metastockusers] MetaStock ADX vs. RealTick ADX
 I'm looking at using the ADX to select between a Stochastic and a moving average crossover system as appropriate for trending vs. channeling/cycling conditions.  Can anyone shed some light on the difference between the ADX indicator displayed in RealTick and the ADX function in MetaStock?  When I plot them on the identical price data in the two different software packages, the results are completely different.  The RealTick ADX behaves as I would expect, with significant variations between higher values (> 30 or so) for trending conditions and lower values (< 30 or so) for channeling conditions.  The RealTick ADX line also begins 14 days after the start of the data for a 14-period ADX.  The MetaStock ADX is nearly a flat line, and begins 28 days after the start of the data (for a 14-period ADX).  It looks like it's being smoothed a second time.I've done some investigation but have not yet done a spreadsheet to re-creat Wilder's formulas from his "New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems".  That's my next step, but I thought someone else may have already figured it out.So far it looks to me like it's a difference in terminology - that the ADX in RealTick is actually Wilder's DX, or the MetaStock DX is actually Wilder's ADX.  I also note that MetaStock's custom formula library includes a custom indicator which calculates ADX and ADXR without rounding, with the note that the built-in indicator is exactly the same as Wilder's original calculations.  I wouldn't think that the rounding difference would be large enough to account for the difference between the two software packages.Thanks.Gary To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
 

 


















www.adest.com.auPhone: Australia:      02 9527 4690          Internat'l: +612 9527 4690          USA & Fax:  1 312 577 0491 



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Attachment: Description: ""