|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Let see if the hocus pocus works. Let me know what you need.
Rajesh
deepak wrote:
> i need help
> i am a astrologer tryin to find relationships betwween planets and stock
> market
> need data for the companies in india or usa
> can some one tell me where i can find the day of registration of
> american and indian companies in web or some one in the list from
> india help me out or from usa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Metastock-List <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 4:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
>
> > > ~What, to you sir, constitutes SERIOUS Technical Analysis?
> >
> > Researching the markets singly or combined using the qualified and
> throughout
> > the times over and over again self-a-prooved TA methods, tools and
> analogies,
> > that are based on prooven fundamentaly solid grounds.
> >
> > > Are you so steeped in the old that you adamantly refuse to accept
> anything new?~~
> >
> > I think from you hanging around too much in the very basement of the
> markets(see further below),
> > have therefore missed the many refreshing mailings that were posted by
> me+a very few others
> > over the past years, eg posts on using new approaches and tools for TA ,
> the markets and
> > in the MSK program.
> >
> > Like anyone that's using common sense and most of all paid attention, than
> you would have
> > also kept a history of my mailings, eg saved them over the past years.
> Then you too would have
> > had now, like many-many others have done, the benifit of also being
> enriched with the many by me
> > or by others written indicators and write ups on old and new technical
> issues and technical analysis
> > of the markets. And would not have asked these dumb questions.
> >
> > One of my largest and most recent refreshments issue posted is the OLE
> connectivety
> > manual(faq's), a quick-manual to now give all MSK users access to and
> therefore the ability
> > to fully use and exploit the figures' crunching Excel program, in
> combination with MSK use.
> >
> > Part of analysis is research, and thus not only for the likes of you that
> are gifted with being
> > short of and lacked in memory, create an Analysis folder in your mail
> program, start saving the
> > valuable mailings and also over time start researching.
> > It would have stopped you from asking these truely dumb blonds questions.
> >
> > > ~~Congratulations to you, sir, on your past successes.
> >
> > Coincidence ?
> > I continuesly keep receiving these type of com(pli)ments for the past 10+
> years...........
> >
> > > You are aware, of course, that markets and methodologies are in a
> constant state of flux and
> > > change because of new people and ideas that come into the trading
> arena.~~
> >
> > See the research and how-to-find-(out about any track records)-information
> above.
> >
> > Markets are constantly on the move, and are way much faster than proper
> new TA approaches.
> > Yes proper, since that most 'new' TA approaches are only copied old ones,
> now with only
> > new names given to them, eg "coated".
> > The ones that are indeed new, of which many still have to proove
> themselves, are rarely posted
> > on the MSK list, unfortunatly if also posted, then by the same small
> group(4-5 members) of
> > constant contributers.
> > Your 1 or 2 contributions over the past 2+ years, didn't help this case
> much either (at all) ofcourse,
> > eg them being mere questions on day Trading Tactics, an issue that's more
> personal, needs
> > so many other criteria's and therefore too not ever to be mixed with TA.
> >
> > > ~~Some of us are very sorry that the quality of our posts are not
> acceptable to your standards.
> >
> > So you should be.
> >
> > > Certainly a man of your standards and demands cannot afford to waste
> your valuable time.
> >
> > True. And a last ever reply to you(and the likes) it therefore is.
> >
> > > It is with much regret
> > > that you will consider leaving this list if we do not all agree to
> accept
> > > your posts as absolute gospel concerning whatever subject is at hand.
> >
> > (In) Aiming for the perfection..........(read: best gaining
> approaches/lessest risks).
> > Your always free/at liberty to counter attack them (correction: You+the
> likes are expelled).
> > That is what discussioning, oppose to chatting (what many of the likes of
> you here like to do),
> > is all about.
> > Let the facts speak. For the values needed to be most successfull in the
> markets, eg to
> > reach the highest levels in gains possible, with the best reduced
> but-always-everywhere-present-
> > risks in viewsight and in controll.
> > And be a true sport like Neal : not personaly feeling to be the countered
> subject, but subject
> > countered being the suggested trading strategy or the analysis (values).
> >
> > > I am certain that the Equis Listmaster would regrettably honor your
> request to
> > > leave us.
> >
> > I am certain that you are a better Belly-speaker(ventriloqist)?
> >
> > > Admittedly, I do confess to a financial gain if you do so decide
> > > to follow through with your threat to depart this list: I would save
> about
> > > $11 every three months on the purchase of keyboards....that is how long
> > > they last before the Delete button wears out due to your voluminous
> > > posts.~~
> >
> > Again if you do your research right than what's, and aside if this stupid
> remark
> > is ever at all applicable(see your research Analysis folder), a $11 loss
> versus
> > a $1100 profit?
> > Are you that stupid, and using your basement markets(see below) margins
> approach ?
> >
> > > ~~Mr. Maas, if you ever trade currencies and/or bonds, you will find
> that
> > > fib levels are an integral part of every trader's and institution's
> > > analysis tools. If you do not understand them, consider learning of
> their
> > > value rather than condemnation simply because their use is beyond your
> > > scope.~~
> >
> > Technical research forbits me to enter the basement of the markets.
> > Plain put : not considdered - out of the question - waste of precious
> time.
> > The Return On Investment(ROI) ratio versus the Risk/Reward(RR) ratio
> tremendously
> > and dramatically overseeds any acceptable values, wether using the
> physicals(underlay)
> > or the higher leveled spin-off synthatics(futures,options).
> > Plain put : Risks are too high than there are the low gains to be made.
> > For institutes(covering positions) and dumb blonds only.
> >
> > > Bon Voyage, Mr. Maas
> >
> > On my TA travels, thank you. Aurivoir, to you too, on your psycho travels
> !!!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ton Maas
> > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2000 15:34
> > Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> >
> >
> > --------crap--------------
> >
> >
> >
|