|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
dear
rakesh i know that it works 100% but the problem is that no one
seems to tell it then as you knw that it is generally well kept
secret
what i need is the timing the company is registred in registrar of
company office
if possible tell me the detalis of the data
i shall be highly thank full to you
----- Original Message -----
From: Rajesh <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> Let see if the hocus pocus works. Let me know what you need.
>
> Rajesh
>
> deepak wrote:
>
> > i need help
> > i am a astrologer tryin to find relationships betwween planets and
stock
> > market
> > need data for the companies in india or usa
> > can some one tell me where i can find the day of registration
of
> > american and indian companies in web or some one in the list
from
> > india help me out or from usa
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Metastock-List <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 4:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> >
> > > > ~What, to you sir, constitutes SERIOUS Technical Analysis?
> > >
> > > Researching the markets singly or combined using the qualified and
> > throughout
> > > the times over and over again self-a-prooved TA methods, tools and
> > analogies,
> > > that are based on prooven fundamentaly solid grounds.
> > >
> > > > Are you so steeped in the old that you adamantly refuse to accept
> > anything new?~~
> > >
> > > I think from you hanging around too much in the very basement of the
> > markets(see further below),
> > > have therefore missed the many refreshing mailings that were posted by
> > me+a very few others
> > > over the past years, eg posts on using new approaches and tools for TA
,
> > the markets and
> > > in the MSK program.
> > >
> > > Like anyone that's using common sense and most of all paid attention,
than
> > you would have
> > > also kept a history of my mailings, eg saved them over the past years.
> > Then you too would have
> > > had now, like many-many others have done, the benifit of also being
> > enriched with the many by me
> > > or by others written indicators and write ups on old and new technical
> > issues and technical analysis
> > > of the markets. And would not have asked these dumb questions.
> > >
> > > One of my largest and most recent refreshments issue posted is the OLE
> > connectivety
> > > manual(faq's), a quick-manual to now give all MSK users access to and
> > therefore the ability
> > > to fully use and exploit the figures' crunching Excel program, in
> > combination with MSK use.
> > >
> > > Part of analysis is research, and thus not only for the likes of you
that
> > are gifted with being
> > > short of and lacked in memory, create an Analysis folder in your mail
> > program, start saving the
> > > valuable mailings and also over time start researching.
> > > It would have stopped you from asking these truely dumb blonds
questions.
> > >
> > > > ~~Congratulations to you, sir, on your past successes.
> > >
> > > Coincidence ?
> > > I continuesly keep receiving these type of com(pli)ments for the past
10+
> > years...........
> > >
> > > > You are aware, of course, that markets and methodologies are in a
> > constant state of flux and
> > > > change because of new people and ideas that come into the trading
> > arena.~~
> > >
> > > See the research and how-to-find-(out about any track
records)-information
> > above.
> > >
> > > Markets are constantly on the move, and are way much faster than
proper
> > new TA approaches.
> > > Yes proper, since that most 'new' TA approaches are only copied old
ones,
> > now with only
> > > new names given to them, eg "coated".
> > > The ones that are indeed new, of which many still have to proove
> > themselves, are rarely posted
> > > on the MSK list, unfortunatly if also posted, then by the same small
> > group(4-5 members) of
> > > constant contributers.
> > > Your 1 or 2 contributions over the past 2+ years, didn't help this
case
> > much either (at all) ofcourse,
> > > eg them being mere questions on day Trading Tactics, an issue that's
more
> > personal, needs
> > > so many other criteria's and therefore too not ever to be mixed with
TA.
> > >
> > > > ~~Some of us are very sorry that the quality of our posts are not
> > acceptable to your standards.
> > >
> > > So you should be.
> > >
> > > > Certainly a man of your standards and demands cannot afford to waste
> > your valuable time.
> > >
> > > True. And a last ever reply to you(and the likes) it therefore is.
> > >
> > > > It is with much regret
> > > > that you will consider leaving this list if we do not all agree to
> > accept
> > > > your posts as absolute gospel concerning whatever subject is at
hand.
> > >
> > > (In) Aiming for the perfection..........(read: best gaining
> > approaches/lessest risks).
> > > Your always free/at liberty to counter attack them (correction:
You+the
> > likes are expelled).
> > > That is what discussioning, oppose to chatting (what many of the likes
of
> > you here like to do),
> > > is all about.
> > > Let the facts speak. For the values needed to be most successfull in
the
> > markets, eg to
> > > reach the highest levels in gains possible, with the best reduced
> > but-always-everywhere-present-
> > > risks in viewsight and in controll.
> > > And be a true sport like Neal : not personaly feeling to be the
countered
> > subject, but subject
> > > countered being the suggested trading strategy or the analysis
(values).
> > >
> > > > I am certain that the Equis Listmaster would regrettably honor your
> > request to
> > > > leave us.
> > >
> > > I am certain that you are a better Belly-speaker(ventriloqist)?
> > >
> > > > Admittedly, I do confess to a financial gain if you do so decide
> > > > to follow through with your threat to depart this list: I would save
> > about
> > > > $11 every three months on the purchase of keyboards....that is how
long
> > > > they last before the Delete button wears out due to your voluminous
> > > > posts.~~
> > >
> > > Again if you do your research right than what's, and aside if this
stupid
> > remark
> > > is ever at all applicable(see your research Analysis folder), a $11
loss
> > versus
> > > a $1100 profit?
> > > Are you that stupid, and using your basement markets(see below)
margins
> > approach ?
> > >
> > > > ~~Mr. Maas, if you ever trade currencies and/or bonds, you will find
> > that
> > > > fib levels are an integral part of every trader's and institution's
> > > > analysis tools. If you do not understand them, consider learning of
> > their
> > > > value rather than condemnation simply because their use is beyond
your
> > > > scope.~~
> > >
> > > Technical research forbits me to enter the basement of the markets.
> > > Plain put : not considdered - out of the question - waste of precious
> > time.
> > > The Return On Investment(ROI) ratio versus the Risk/Reward(RR) ratio
> > tremendously
> > > and dramatically overseeds any acceptable values, wether using the
> > physicals(underlay)
> > > or the higher leveled spin-off synthatics(futures,options).
> > > Plain put : Risks are too high than there are the low gains to be
made.
> > > For institutes(covering positions) and dumb blonds
only.
> > >
> > > > Bon Voyage, Mr. Maas
> > >
> > > On my TA travels, thank you. Aurivoir, to you too, on your psycho
travels
> > !!!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> > > Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2000 15:34
> > > Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> > >
> > >
> > > --------crap--------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
|