|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
i need help
i am a astrologer tryin to find relationships betwween planets and stock
market
need data for the companies in india or usa
can some one tell me where i can find the day of registration of
american and indian companies in web or some one in the list from
india help me out or from usa
----- Original Message -----
From: A.J. Maas <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Metastock-List <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
> > ~What, to you sir, constitutes SERIOUS Technical Analysis?
>
> Researching the markets singly or combined using the qualified and
throughout
> the times over and over again self-a-prooved TA methods, tools and
analogies,
> that are based on prooven fundamentaly solid grounds.
>
> > Are you so steeped in the old that you adamantly refuse to accept
anything new?~~
>
> I think from you hanging around too much in the very basement of the
markets(see further below),
> have therefore missed the many refreshing mailings that were posted by
me+a very few others
> over the past years, eg posts on using new approaches and tools for TA ,
the markets and
> in the MSK program.
>
> Like anyone that's using common sense and most of all paid attention, than
you would have
> also kept a history of my mailings, eg saved them over the past years.
Then you too would have
> had now, like many-many others have done, the benifit of also being
enriched with the many by me
> or by others written indicators and write ups on old and new technical
issues and technical analysis
> of the markets. And would not have asked these dumb questions.
>
> One of my largest and most recent refreshments issue posted is the OLE
connectivety
> manual(faq's), a quick-manual to now give all MSK users access to and
therefore the ability
> to fully use and exploit the figures' crunching Excel program, in
combination with MSK use.
>
> Part of analysis is research, and thus not only for the likes of you that
are gifted with being
> short of and lacked in memory, create an Analysis folder in your mail
program, start saving the
> valuable mailings and also over time start researching.
> It would have stopped you from asking these truely dumb blonds questions.
>
> > ~~Congratulations to you, sir, on your past successes.
>
> Coincidence ?
> I continuesly keep receiving these type of com(pli)ments for the past 10+
years...........
>
> > You are aware, of course, that markets and methodologies are in a
constant state of flux and
> > change because of new people and ideas that come into the trading
arena.~~
>
> See the research and how-to-find-(out about any track records)-information
above.
>
> Markets are constantly on the move, and are way much faster than proper
new TA approaches.
> Yes proper, since that most 'new' TA approaches are only copied old ones,
now with only
> new names given to them, eg "coated".
> The ones that are indeed new, of which many still have to proove
themselves, are rarely posted
> on the MSK list, unfortunatly if also posted, then by the same small
group(4-5 members) of
> constant contributers.
> Your 1 or 2 contributions over the past 2+ years, didn't help this case
much either (at all) ofcourse,
> eg them being mere questions on day Trading Tactics, an issue that's more
personal, needs
> so many other criteria's and therefore too not ever to be mixed with TA.
>
> > ~~Some of us are very sorry that the quality of our posts are not
acceptable to your standards.
>
> So you should be.
>
> > Certainly a man of your standards and demands cannot afford to waste
your valuable time.
>
> True. And a last ever reply to you(and the likes) it therefore is.
>
> > It is with much regret
> > that you will consider leaving this list if we do not all agree to
accept
> > your posts as absolute gospel concerning whatever subject is at hand.
>
> (In) Aiming for the perfection..........(read: best gaining
approaches/lessest risks).
> Your always free/at liberty to counter attack them (correction: You+the
likes are expelled).
> That is what discussioning, oppose to chatting (what many of the likes of
you here like to do),
> is all about.
> Let the facts speak. For the values needed to be most successfull in the
markets, eg to
> reach the highest levels in gains possible, with the best reduced
but-always-everywhere-present-
> risks in viewsight and in controll.
> And be a true sport like Neal : not personaly feeling to be the countered
subject, but subject
> countered being the suggested trading strategy or the analysis (values).
>
> > I am certain that the Equis Listmaster would regrettably honor your
request to
> > leave us.
>
> I am certain that you are a better Belly-speaker(ventriloqist)?
>
> > Admittedly, I do confess to a financial gain if you do so decide
> > to follow through with your threat to depart this list: I would save
about
> > $11 every three months on the purchase of keyboards....that is how long
> > they last before the Delete button wears out due to your voluminous
> > posts.~~
>
> Again if you do your research right than what's, and aside if this stupid
remark
> is ever at all applicable(see your research Analysis folder), a $11 loss
versus
> a $1100 profit?
> Are you that stupid, and using your basement markets(see below) margins
approach ?
>
> > ~~Mr. Maas, if you ever trade currencies and/or bonds, you will find
that
> > fib levels are an integral part of every trader's and institution's
> > analysis tools. If you do not understand them, consider learning of
their
> > value rather than condemnation simply because their use is beyond your
> > scope.~~
>
> Technical research forbits me to enter the basement of the markets.
> Plain put : not considdered - out of the question - waste of precious
time.
> The Return On Investment(ROI) ratio versus the Risk/Reward(RR) ratio
tremendously
> and dramatically overseeds any acceptable values, wether using the
physicals(underlay)
> or the higher leveled spin-off synthatics(futures,options).
> Plain put : Risks are too high than there are the low gains to be made.
> For institutes(covering positions) and dumb blonds only.
>
> > Bon Voyage, Mr. Maas
>
> On my TA travels, thank you. Aurivoir, to you too, on your psycho travels
!!!
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Al Taglavore" <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2000 15:34
> Subject: Re: Nasdaq charts/was Be Warned about Guru's
>
>
> --------crap--------------
>
>
>
|