PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><HTML>
List,
<BR>I am looking for a online-broker for trading US-futures and -stocks,
which is accepting
<BR>Non-US Residents as customers, reliable on easy terms and within easy
reach.
<BR>Any specific experience with Chadwick for futures and / or Web <FONT COLOR="#00CC00"><FONT SIZE=+1>STREET</FONT></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#FF0000"><FONT SIZE=-1>(master)</FONT></FONT> for stocks?
<P>Same request about US-Stockdata vendors.
<BR>Because I am not a computer expert I am looking here too for an reliable
datasource for easy updating eod MetaStock files. Has anybody experience
with Worden Bros. / TC 2000 ?
<P>From my site, I am using since over two years Pinnacle Data for futures
eod data, and I
<BR>think highly of this company.
<P>Currently I am still working with MS 5.11, I will change later this
year to version 6.x. Will
<BR>I have to expect difficulties to convert my indicators, systems, scans
etc. to the new version ?
<BR>Thanx for sharing your experience to me and good trading at all
<P>Detlev</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 26 10:06:41 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA08424
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:24:25 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA30280
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:52:17 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA30276
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:52:13 -0600
Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.39])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA10949
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:06:41 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from micron ([12.73.225.164]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
id <19990626155334.DQHX1417@xxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:53:34 +0000
Message-ID: <002201bebfeb$fe5bc740$a4e1490c@xxxxxx>
From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <002d01bebfc9$4b89b400$2c1b3018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Off Topic:IE 5
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:47:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01BEBFC1.5AEB0E60"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>this doesn't answer your question. I use
Netscape. Everytime someone tries to convince me to use the latest version
of IE, I take a look at IE and stay with Netscape. Netscape seems to offer the
user more control and flexibility of their internet activities. I do keep
IE on my computer. Occasionally some sites are easier to access using IE
than with Netscape.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Bill Saxon
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock,
EMail List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, June 26, 1999 6:44
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Off Topic:IE 5</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Has anyone upgraded to IE 5 and if so would
they recommend it?? I tried it as a Beta and didn't really like it for
some reason I can't remember.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A
href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx">bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>m</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 26 10:06:39 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA08420
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:24:23 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA30286
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:52:28 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA30283
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:52:25 -0600
Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.39])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA10952
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:06:53 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from micron ([12.73.225.164]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
id <19990626155345.DQKP1417@xxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:53:45 +0000
Message-ID: <002301bebfec$053ca480$a4e1490c@xxxxxx>
From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3774C893.60CFC690@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Online-Brokers and Stockdata vendors
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:52:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01BEBFC2.0BBC4100"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Detley:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>A number of US brokers have international operations and they
also have online trading. Telescan also offer their services to non US
customers. Their data can be downloaded into metastock using the
Downloader. If they have fixed their problem with downloading in Metastock after
a 3 day weekend, you might take a look at them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Detlev Gesche
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock-List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, June 26, 1999 7:33
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Online-Brokers and Stockdata
vendors</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>List, <BR>I am looking for a online-broker for trading
US-futures and -stocks, which is accepting <BR>Non-US Residents as customers,
reliable on easy terms and within easy reach. <BR>Any specific experience with
Chadwick for futures and / or Web <FONT color=#00cc00><FONT
size=+1>STREET</FONT></FONT> <FONT color=#ff0000><FONT
size=-1>(master)</FONT></FONT> for stocks?
<P>Same request about US-Stockdata vendors. <BR>Because I am not a computer
expert I am looking here too for an reliable datasource for easy updating eod
MetaStock files. Has anybody experience with Worden Bros. / TC 2000 ?
<P>From my site, I am using since over two years Pinnacle Data for futures eod
data, and I <BR>think highly of this company.
<P>Currently I am still working with MS 5.11, I will change later this year to
version 6.x. Will <BR>I have to expect difficulties to convert my indicators,
systems, scans etc. to the new version ? <BR>Thanx for sharing your experience
to me and good trading at all
<P>Detlev </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 26 10:26:40 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09103
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:25:23 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA30921
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:55:08 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA30918
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:55:05 -0600
Received: from slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net (slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net [206.81.128.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA10983
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:09:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (qmail 4194 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 1999 16:56:25 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@fixme
Received: (qmail 4187 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 1999 16:56:24 -0000
Received: from edsl142.slkc.uswest.net (HELO Nicholas) (209.181.81.142)
by slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net with SMTP; 26 Jun 1999 16:56:24 -0000
From: "Nicholas Kormanik" <nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Off Topic:IE 5
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:56:32 -0600
Message-ID: <LMBBKJCLKIJIBBJLAEIJOEFKCGAA.nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <002d01bebfc9$4b89b400$2c1b3018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
I like IE 5 quite a bit. The only extremely annoying problem I've
encountered is:
a) Say you have a web browser window open and set up exactly as you want it
(for instance, your on-line broker, with all your next-trade info placed
there), and you then minimize it to get your 'desktop' exposed;
b) You have web shortcuts on your desktop, one of which you want to quickly
bring up;
c) You double-click on that desktop icon, and it's web page connection comes
up as you would expect. You visit the site, and close that particular web
window;
d) You want to place a trade on the security you've been stalking;
e) You suddenly realize that IE 5 did not create a 'new' window for step c),
but instead used your open web window in step a), and now you are going to
have to log on to your on-line broker again, and you are so miffed about it
all that you miss your trade opportunity.
This happens to me regularly, and I hate it. Netscape opens up new and
separate windows when you double-click on any desktop icons (**but**
Netscape is about three times as long in loading).
I wish IE 5 allowed one to 'lock' particular web windows (like your on-line
broker, all set up for your coming trade), so that double-clicking on some
desktop icon would not suddenly take these over.
Nicholas
|