|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Detlev Gesche
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock-List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, June 26, 1999 2:33
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Online-Brokers and Stockdata
vendors</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><Any specific experience with Chadwick for futures and / or Web <FONT
color=#00cc00><FONT size=+1>STREET</FONT></FONT> <FONT color=#ff0000><FONT
size=-1>(master)</FONT></FONT> for stocks? ></DIV>
<DIV>Since over a year I´m a customer of DATEK (<A
href="http://www.DATEK.com";>WWW.DATEK.com</A> ). My experience with them is
very well. They are very fast and cheap (9.99$). Comparing it with the
German-Online-Brokers I have to claim that they (the German-Broker) still have
a long way to go to reach this level. I´m a customer of COMDIRECT Bank so I
see the difference daily.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><Same request about US-Stockdata vendors. <BR>Because I am not a
computer expert I am looking here too for an reliable datasource for easy
updating eod MetaStock files. Has anybody experience with Worden Bros. / TC
2000 ? <</DIV>
<P>I sugest to take a look at QuotesPlus.(<A
href="http://www.Quotes-plus.com";>WWW.Quotes-plus.com</A>). I have the
best experience with them too and they get better and better. They have their
own Charting and Scanningprogramm. On SI is a board where you can get more
Information. The Data is ready at ca. 0.30 - 1.00 pm. I use automation Scripts
(WinBatch) for download in the night(ca. 2-3 minutes), running scans and
converting the data to the Metastockformat. After ca. 10 minutes everthing is
ready. So I get at breakfast my coffee and the charts with my daily scans and
can easily set up my orders to Datek. ;-)
<P>Regards
<P>Thorsten</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 26 10:46:42 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09304
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:37:47 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA31078
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:07:12 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA31075
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:07:09 -0600
Received: from netra.mediom.qc.ca (netra.mediom.qc.ca [207.96.136.2])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11004
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:21:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from alpha (ppp202.84.mque.videotron.net [207.253.84.202])
by netra.mediom.qc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA22789
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert Duplain" <rduplain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Off Topic:IE 5
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:06:18 -0400
Message-ID: <000501bebff6$93d32160$8e54fdcf@xxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01BEBFD5.0CC18160"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <002201bebfeb$fe5bc740$a4e1490c@xxxxxx>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=790485316-26061999>I was
an unconditionnal of Netscape...till I try IE5. IE5 is starting faster and
is more user friendly. It has a better bookmark handling system.
Installing IE5 will find and convert bookmark from Netscape. It will
creste a directory Favorite under Windows were it keeps all
bookmarks.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=790485316-26061999>The
only flaw, it si less intelligent finding site from reduced title. Let say
you want to go on Equiis site. Typing "Equiis" in Netscape will
direct you on <A
href="http://www.equis.com";>http://www.equis.com</A>. With IE you
need to type <A
href="http://www.equis.com";>www.equis.com</A>.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=790485316-26061999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=790485316-26061999>The
last version I was using was 4.5</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=790485316-26061999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=790485316-26061999>Robert </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> Lionel Issen<BR><B>Sent:</B> 26 juin, 1999 11:48<BR><B>To:</B>
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Off Topic:IE
5<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>this doesn't answer your question. I use
Netscape. Everytime someone tries to convince me to use the latest
version of IE, I take a look at IE and stay with Netscape. Netscape seems to
offer the user more control and flexibility of their internet
activities. I do keep IE on my computer. Occasionally some sites
are easier to access using IE than with Netscape.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Bill
Saxon</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock, EMail List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, June 26, 1999 6:44
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Off Topic:IE 5</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Has anyone upgraded to IE 5 and if so would
they recommend it?? I tried it as a Beta and didn't really like it for
some reason I can't remember.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Bill Saxon<BR><A
href="mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx";>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>m</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 26 12:12:45 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA10223
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:11:22 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA32062
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:40:16 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA32059
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:40:13 -0600
Received: from dewey.mindlink.net (dewey.mindlink.net [204.174.16.4])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA11041
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:54:41 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cr247296-a.surrey1.bc.wave.home.com ([24.113.141.35] helo=CR247296-A)
by dewey.mindlink.net with esmtp (Exim 2.11 #11)
id 10xxOu-0008SW-00
for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:42:04 -0700
Message-Id: <4.2.0.56.19990626114005.00a50ca0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: ullrich_fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.56 (Beta)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:41:59 -0700
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Ullrich Fischer <uf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Off Topic:IE 5
In-Reply-To: <000501bebff6$93d32160$8e54fdcf@xxxxx>
References: <002201bebfeb$fe5bc740$a4e1490c@xxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
I agree. Netscape 4.51 is slower, clunkier, and crashes more often than
IE5. I'm unlikely to go back to Netscape now. IE has won the browser
wars. -uf
At 01:06 PM 6/26/99 -0400, Robert Duplain wrote:
>I was an unconditionnal of Netscape...till I try IE5. IE5 is starting
>faster and is more user friendly. It has a better bookmark handling
>system. Installing IE5 will find and convert bookmark from Netscape. It
>will creste a directory Favorite under Windows were it keeps all bookmarks.
>The only flaw, it si less intelligent finding site from reduced
>title. Let say you want to go on Equiis site. Typing "Equiis" in
>Netscape will direct you on
><http://www.equis.com>http://www.equis.com. With IE you need to type
><http://www.equis.com>www.equis.com.
>
>The last version I was using was 4.5
>
>Robert
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lionel Issen
>>Sent: 26 juin, 1999 11:48
>>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: Off Topic:IE 5
>>
>>Bill:
>>
>>this doesn't answer your question. I use Netscape. Everytime someone
>>tries to convince me to use the latest version of IE, I take a look at IE
>>and stay with Netscape. Netscape seems to offer the user more control and
>>flexibility of their internet activities. I do keep IE on my
>>computer. Occasionally some sites are easier to access using IE than
>>with Netscape.
>>
>>Lionel
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: <mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Bill Saxon
>>>To: <mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock, EMail List
>>>Sent: Saturday, June 26, 1999 6:44 AM
>>>Subject: Off Topic:IE 5
>>>
>>>Has anyone upgraded to IE 5 and if so would they recommend it?? I tried
>>>it as a Beta and didn't really like it for some reason I can't remember.
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Bill Saxon
>>><mailto:bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxx>bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|