|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=x-user-defined" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>I lost the capability to retain
specific file view settings on my computer. Now when I open Metastock or any
other folder in any directory I have to constantly reset the file view by name.
It always comes up everywhere by date. Problem is I need to view files by
alphabetical order and not by date. When I reset each newly opened file, after I
leave and come back it "defaults" to listing by date. I apologize for
the "off topic" question, but it is affecting metastock. Can someone
help. Thank you. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Apr 09 19:43:18 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 18490
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:41:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA32046
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:26:03 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA32043
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:26:01 -0600
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu08.email.msn.com [207.46.181.30])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA05065
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 19:18:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pavilion - 208.253.208.11 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Fri, 9 Apr 1999 18:06:34 -0700
Message-ID: <000a01be8307$900355e0$0bd0fdd0@xxxxxxxx>
From: "Jim Greening" <JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Building Blocks - MetaStock Tests - 04_Tema PV Binary Wave, StochRSI_21
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:05:31 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 35f8315bc65ce0fa70d2abf017048306.0b
All,
I’ve been very busy and got away from the discussion of my MetaStock
System tests. This week I'm going to get back on track and discuss my
fourth MetaStock Profit System Test - 04_Tema PV Binary Wave, StochRSI_21.
As you may recall from my post last fall, I wanted to develop a binary
wave and a binary wave system test based on price and volume patterns to
supplement my indicator - Binary Wave Composite. I didn't want to use any
indicators except price and volume. I'd hoped to use all the old sayings
such as higher highs and higher lows are bullish, breakouts and big moves on
large volume, etc. I developed the binary wave with the help and
participation of several on this forum.
After a lot of experimenting, we came up with the following Binary wave
formulas:
PVBW01 (Highs & Lows)
If(HHV(L,8) = HHV(L,21),2,0) +
If(HHV(L,21) = HHV(L,55),2,0) +
If(HHV(L,55) = HHV(L,233),1,0) +
If(HHV(H,8) = HHV(H,21),2,0) +
If(HHV(H,21) = HHV(H,55),2,0) +
If(HHV(H,55) = HHV(H,233),1,0) +
If(LLV(H,8) = LLV(H,21),-2,0) +
If(LLV(H,21) = LLV(H,55),-2,0) +
If(LLV(H,55) = LLV(H,233),-1,0) +
If(LLV(L,8) = LLV(L,21),-2,0) +
If(LLV(L,21) = LLV(L,55),-2,0) +
If(LLV(L,55) = LLV(L,233),-1,0)
PVBW02 (High Vol Move)
If(Mov(V,3,S) > 1.02*Mov(V,21,S),1,0) *
If(C > Ref(H,-1),2,0) +
If(Mov(V,2,S) > 1.02*Mov(V,21,S),1,0) *
If(C < Ref(L,-1),-2,0)
PVBW03 (New 233 Day High or Low)
((If(Mov(V,2,S) > 1.02*Mov(V,21,S),1,0)) *
If((H = HHV(H,233)),3,0)) +
((If(Mov(V,2,S) > 1.02*Mov(V,21,S),1,0)) *
If((L = LLV(L,233)),-3,0))
PVBW04 (Price Look Back)
(2*(C-Ref(C,-21)) + 2*(C-Ref(C,-55)) + (C-Ref(C,-233)))/C
The idea behind PVBW01 was the old idea that higher highs and higher
lows are bullish and lower lows and lower highs are bearish. We decided
that it made sense to test for short, intermediate, and long term
indications. We used the Fibonacci values of 21, 55, and 233 days for
short, intermediate, and long term moving averages. After a lot of
experimenting, we gave more weight to the short and intermediate term
results.
The idea behind PVBW02 was that a close above yesterdays high is
bullish if it happens on good volume. Conversely, a close below yesterdays
low is bearish if it happens on good volume. After more experimenting, we
assigned a weight of +2 and –2 when these conditions were met.
The idea behind PVBW03 is similar except we use new yearly highs and
lows. We also assign more weight for meeting this condition.
The idea behind PVBW04 is different. I wanted a look back indicator of
some sort as the final component. I started with a 21, 55, and 233 day look
back of the close and made it bullish or bearish just on comparing the two
closing prices. However, when I got to thinking about this I thought it was
just another way of getting the same results as our first binary wave. What
I really wanted was momentum, so I came up with the idea of subtracting the
two closes, assigning different weightings (our old 2, 2, 1) relationship,
and then dividing by the closing price to normalize the results so there
wouldn't be differences between low and high priced stocks.
To get the final PVBW formula, I first had to add each together with
the following formula:
PVBW Add
Fml("PVBW01") + Fml("PVBW02") + Fml("PVBW03") +
Fml("PVBW04")
Finally the last formula applies Tema Smoothing as follows:
Tema PV Binary Wave
Periods := Input("Enter Tema Smoothing Periods",8,55,21);
Tema(Fml("PVBW Add"),Periods)
After we got the formula, the next challenge was how to test it. To
develop the PVBW we used a simple zero cross over test to determine the
appropriate variables for each of the Binary Wave components. The original
test was:
05_Tema PV Binary Wave
ENTER LONG:
Cross(Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave"),0)
ENTER SHORT:
Cross(0,Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave"))
We improved that considerably and came up with the following test:
04_Tema PV Binary Wave, StochRSI_21
ENTER LONG:
(Cross(Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave"),opt1) AND
Fml("Tema StochRSI_21") > 0) OR
(Cross(Fml("Tema StochRSI_21"),0) AND
Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave") > 0)
CLOSE LONG:
Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave") < -opt1 AND
Fml("Tema StochRSI_21") < 0
ENTER SHORT:
Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave") < opt2 AND
Fml("Tema StochRSI_21") < 0.1*opt2
CLOSE SHORT:
Fml("Tema PV Binary Wave") > 0 AND
Fml("Tema StochRSI_21") > 0
OPTIMIZATION:
Opt1: Min = -5, Max = +5, Step = +5
Opt2: Min = -8, Max = -2, Step = +3
Before I discuss the test, I first need the following formula:
Tema StochRSI_21
Periods := Input("Enter Periods",5,233,21);
Tema(((RSI(Periods) - LLV(RSI(Periods ),Periods)) /
((HHV(RSI(Periods),Periods)) - LLV(RSI(Periods),Periods))) -
0.5,periods)
That’s just the standard stochRSI formula that I tweaked to allow use of
Fibonacci numbers and Tema smoothing.
Now back to the test. We get a enter long signal when the Tema PV
Binary Wave crosses an optimized number and is confirmed by Tema StochRSI_21
being greater than 0 or when Tema StochRSI_21 crosses 0 and is confirmed by
Tema PV Binary Wave being greater than 0. We get a close long signal when
both Tema PV Binary Wave is less than minus opt1 and Tema StochRSI_21 is
less than 0. Since the market is biased upwards, we want the short signals
to be based on tougher critera, Therefore the enter Short signal is only
generated when both the Tema PV Binary Wave and the Tema stochRSI are less
than an optimized number. We close the Short when both are above 0.
That’s it. Any suggestions?
JimG
|