|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dan
I assumed that there was no Y2K solution for MS for DOS since Equis
announced they would be supporting Y2K for MS for Windows and not the DOS
version. I really didn't test it out. I probably should.
I got absolutely nothing done this week and not much in the last few weeks,
My better half's been sick with the flu and my 8 year old was home from
school all week with a bug.
Tomorrow, I get to do a little work and then have another part of my
physical that I managed to avoid for many years. Oh well, maybe Tuesday
will be productive.
And the new puppy isn't housebroken yet....
Regards
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of D.Henderson
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 1999 8:21 AM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Y2K solution for Metastock for DOS
At 10:26 PM 2/19/99 -0800, "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Arun
>
>I only wish they had Y2K support for v4.5 MS DOS. Even though I have all
of
>the newer versions. I'm going to try to get my stuff running under 6.52
but
>it never ran under 6.0 so I don't have high hopes. I actually ran the
>automated conversion moving over to MS for Windows and my stuff didn't
>execute well. The DOS version runs at least 30 times faster than the WIN
>version, not counting the disk thrashing. I'm going to rekey everything
>from scratch and see if this helps. If not, I'm moving everything over to
>Visual Basic and quit screwing around with MS except to use for charting.
>
>Regards
>
>Guy
>
Good Plan!!! VB should work fine (Myself, I use Fortran 77)
Yes, MS is a great little specialized charting utility!! (Key words,
"little" and "utility". No flames intended!)
How did your Y2K test on MS V4.5 for DOS work out??
(From your statements above, can I assume not so well??)
Dan H.
|