[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Was thinking of Metastock but now not so sure



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Also on Fri, 19 Feb 1999 Jim Michael <genepool@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 BuyersG@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>   Also,  I think you guys should  code your topics with key words like:
>> programming,  files,  upgrades, formulas, indicators, datafeed,  etc.
>
>Good suggestion.

I agree on this point.

>>  And i think Metastock should have a dedicated FULL TIME time person
teaching,
>> explaining and describing new offerings on here EVERY day.
>
>Equis had folks participating in the Compuserve investors forum a few
>years ago (still may, don't go there anymore) but it seemed like they
>were always in defense mode, so no telling how that would go over here
>(no moderators). Their website would be a better medium, most likely.


I disagree here.  I think many of the threads on this list could be
shortened or 'solved' if Equis promptly answered software related
questions, acknowledged existing MS problems and generally provided us with
more information about the current software and where MetaStock will be
going in the future.

Most of us here are pretty reasonable, have a genuine desire to get the
most out of the software, would like to see the software improve, and
finally (and most importantly) would like to focus on trading.  I don't
think Equis has to fear us.

Rob

Dr. Robert Jackson
robert.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxx