|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree with you Brooke. Lying is bad anytime. Adultery is also against the will of God. But to impeach a President, I feel he has to break the law. Lying under oath in a Court of Law is that law breaking.
Don
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/16/98, at 8:16 PM, Brookemail@xxxxxxx wrote:
>In a message dated 9/16/98 4:45:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>daringdon@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> It's not the act, although its morally wrong. It was the lying under oath,
>> Perjury, that I feel should be reason for impeachment. If you or I lied
>> under oath, and were caught, we would be in jail. Is he above the law?
>>
>> Don
>
>How about lying, but not under oath? Idaho Rep. Helen Chenoweth denied her
>affair when first confronted with it in 1995, a reporter for the Spokane
>Spokesman-Review says. Or is it just lying under oath that you're conveniently
>concerned about? Are the vows of marriage an oath? Is an affair in itself a
>lie, when your spouse doesn't know about it? Did Reps. Dan Burton and Henry
>Hyde in effect lie to their familes? Or are you concerned only about lying to
>prosecutors? Are you concerned about character? "This hypocrite broke up my
>family," says the former husband of a woman who reportedly had an affair with
>Hyde. Which is worse, lying before a prosecutor, or lying before God?
>
>http://ww1.salonmagazine.com/news/1998/09/cov_16newsb.html
>
>http://ww1.salonmagazine.com/news/1998/09/16newsc.html
>
>What a can of worms that zealous prosecutor has opened.
>
>Can we please have the stars and stripes back, without Mr. Starr?
>
>Brooke
|