|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><HTML>
<P>Jim Michael wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Steve Karnish wrote:
<BR>> to give help, if I can. I even want to help you...I live in
<BR>> Idaho and I can email you the names of some panhandle rightwing
<BR>> groups that are really into censorship.
<P>netiquette != censorship
<P>If a reply to a lister is for that lister only (please send me a copy
of
<BR>the .gif file, <html><h1>please add me to your Gann &nbsp;&nbsp;
email
<BR>list</h1></html>, etc.) there is no need to send it to everyone
on the list.
<BR>What is it of value that you learn from these messages? What is wrong
<BR>with being courteous to the other list members and how is this
<BR>censorship?
<P>Cheers,
<P>Jim</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>This is my first group post, and may be my last---<B>Thank you</B>,
Jim; your message is a lot of good, courtious "common sense".
<P>Bill</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Thu Aug 27 13:19:50 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 4819
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA25354
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 09:07:20 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA25346
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 09:07:13 -0600
Received: from bewley.net (ug@xxxxxxxxxx [208.160.14.237])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00355
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 09:16:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from ug@xxxxxxxxx)
by bewley.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA08134
for metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:14:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <13797.30648.152670.865782@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:14:00 -0500 (EST)
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Formula Help-MS ver 5.11
In-Reply-To: <35E548A6.F85FF373@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <199808261816.NAA04997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<35E4B245.160B4640@xxxxxxxx>
<35E548A6.F85FF373@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: VM 6.59 under Emacs 19.34.1
From: UG <ug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Attribution: UG
Organization: Yeah, right
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
John Manasco writes:
> > You have set up two mutually exclusive conditions:
> >
> > a. the open plus ATR(10) * .250 be LESS than yesterday's close, and
> >
> > b. the open plus ATR(10) *.0125 be GREATER than yesterday's close.
^^^^^
0.125 was in the original post, but that
doesn't matter for this discussion.
> Why not? If for example the open is 10 and the atr(10) is 2 then
> Open+ATR(10)*.250=10+2*.250=10.5 and 10*2*.125=10.250. So we are looking at
> any number between 10.250 and 10.5.
No, you're looking for a number between 10.5 and 10.25, in that order.
If open is 10, yesterday's close is C, and atr(10) is 2, then according to the
formulas,
10 + 2 * 0.250 = 10.5
10 + 2 * 0.125 = 10.25
as you say, but the formula says that 10.5 must be LESS than C and 10.25 must
be GREATER than C, which clearly can't BOTH be true.
I.e., we want C such that:
10.50 < C < 10.25.
Since 10.25 < 10.50, it can never be satisfied.
========================================================================
"Weinberg's Second Law" If builders built buildings the way programmers
wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would have
destroyed civilization.
http://www.unixgeek.com/cgi-bin/motd.pl - PGP email preferred
|