[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: future of MSWIN



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Count me in for a loud yell.

I have raised the issue with them a couple of times.  Yes, they also told me
that I was the first to raise the issue.  You'd think that the equis support
people would get together now an again and compare notes.  Maybe I am being
unreasonble in assuming that.

If equis are not carefull I think another company may come up with a product
that takes market share away from them.  I am sure that most of us would pay
a little extra if we could get additional functionality such as running
system tests on a portfolio of securities or maybe running a system test
that references multiple securities.

Equis, are you listening?  Please reply to the forum if you can hear us or
are indeed still listening.

All said and done, metastock is still a top class product and I am sure I'll
be using for many years to come.

E.

John Manasco wrote:

> If anyone read Equis response to Altons query you will notice George
> from Equis says that they have not received many requests for the
> ability to system test across multiple securities. I know this has been
> a discussion on this list on many occasions and is one of the features
> that separates Tradestation from Metastock. Maybe if we all yell at once
> we will be heard.
>
> John Manasco