PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Not to appear Sarcastic but obviosuly you have never programmed a computer
and don't understand the underlying complexities that exist within. Your
emprical evidence is based on a sample of 1 which is statistically
insignificant. I could write a book on why your assumptions are wrong but
its definitely off topic so I will leave it at that. Again, I don't mean to
seem like a smart ass but you arguments are unfounded.
sorry,
Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Thomas Duke
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 1998 4:48 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Windows 98
>
>
> I just don't understand. I have Win98 and it works just fine - no
> problems at
> all and you have a nightmare. Unless you have a defective copy of Win98 it
> should work. From my personal empirical evidence Win98 works
> (it's a fact).
> Maybe your computer set up is incorrect - you must of had
> problems with Win95. I
> know of no cards or drivers that worked with '95 not working under '98. I
> installed Win98 over '95 and all programs and files work the same
> or better.
> Take your copy back for an exchange (hopefully your not using a beta or
> blackmarket copy) because as said, it's a fact, Win98 works.
>
> Alton Stephens wrote:
>
> > Donald Webster is right. Windows 98 has been an absolute
> nightmare. Had to
> > buy a new video card because original card would not recognize higher
> > resolutions anymore and no driver updates worked- period.
> Worse, Internet
> > connections are completely blasted, and I will now have to do a
> third clean
> > install of Win 98 in order to fix this- our firm's computer
> consultants have
> > spent all day with the computer and have done everything
> possible to correct
> > the prob, to no avail.
> >
> > Win 98 is a hit or miss proposition- you may be lucky and
> happy, or you may
> > be maximally screwed, and you have no control over it.
> >
> > If Win 95 is working, then skip Win 98.
> >
> > Alton Stephens
> > astephen@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Harley Meyer
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 11:31 PM
> > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: Windows 98
> > >
> > >
> > > Your problem here is the screen resolution. Just change it.
> > >
> > > Harley
> > >
> > > Myron B. [Bruce] Slomka wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sean W. Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > betcha you did a update install.
> > > > >
> > > > > try format C:
> > > > >
> > > > > then install...
> > > > >
> > > > > will work much better then. Carrying along all your old
> > > problems will not
> > > > > result in a more stable system...
> > > > >
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Donald Webster
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 1998 5:22 AM
> > > > > > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Windows 98
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Has anyone taken the plunge on Windows 98? If so what is
> > > your opinion
> > > > > > >of it and is it worth the money?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have installed (and re-installed) Win98 and wish I
> hadn't. I was
> > > > > > told it was more robust and would prevent crashes. Wrong! It
> > > > > > screwed up several programs including an Internet connection. In
> > > > > > discussion with the ISP helpdesk guru, he said it had caused a
> > > > > > large number of problems for them and he certainly would not be
> > > > > > installing it on his computer. Since installing it, my
> machine slips
> > > > > > into an apallingly slow mode, performing like an old XT. IMHO it
> > > > > > is a dead loss and I certainly will not be recommending it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DMW
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Your're right on about installing from the start after
> > > reformatting the C: drive. I did that on my laptop and it
> worked fine.
> > > >
> > > > I just upgraded my desktop OS from Windows95 and it still
> crashes; in
> > > > addition i have a boot up sequence that lost some files and
> the start up
> > > > looks for connections that requires me to hit the space bar
> 4 times to
> > > > complete the boot process.
> > > >
> > > > An interesting thing happens to MS 6.5 under Windows98.
> > > > All of the stock containing directories no show Name,
> Symbol, and first
> > > > and last dates of data for each security but scroll
> vertically instead
> > > > of horizontally. This makes it more difficult to locate stocks by
> > > > scrolling through the list. Has anybody else noticed this?? I
> > > > contacted equis support for a fix. I'm not aware of
> changing the set up
> > > > of these directory listings although anythoing can happen
> by hitting the
> > > > wrong key.
> > > >
> > > > Bruce Slomka
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
|