|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"Equis Support acknowledge this problem running under the release Win98, and
say they are
working on the problem. They will not provide a date for a fix or even if a
fix will be made available."
There are so many things in MSWIN that need fixing, but Equis doesn't seem
to response by providing free fixes but just issuing a new version and still
holding on to defects for some unknown reason. Why should there be any
restrictions to directory size, 255 or 2000? Why can't we system test
multi-stocks instead of one at a time? etc.?
Richard Estes
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Mitchell <ianm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock post <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, July 09, 1998 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: Windows 98
>I have been using Win98 Betas for over a year and have installed the
release
>version on a number of machines from Laptops to Pentiums without incident.
>It is certainly more stable than Win95, and runs all applications as well
as
>or faster than Win95. From a support and reliability point of view it is
>definitely worth upgrading. I also believe it makes life easier for the
user
>as well.
>
>There is only one exception that I have encountered and that is Metastock
>V6.5 which does not correctly display Chart Tips under Win98. It has had
>this problem through the betas and the release Win98. Equis Support
>acknowledge this problem running under the release Win98, and say they are
>working on the problem. They will not provide a date for a fix or even if a
>fix will be made available.
>
>They have suggested keeping an eye on the Tech Support Files area of their
>web site. This is
>where any change files would be posted.
>
>
>Regards
>Ian
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Saxon <bsaxon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Fasttrack E-mail List <fasttrack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Metastock E-mail List
><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Thursday, 9 July 1998 6:50
>Subject: Windows 98
>
>
>>Has anyone taken the plunge on Windows 98? If so what is your opinion
>>of it and is it worth the money?
>>
>>
>
>
>
|