[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: A shorter syntax to reference past elements of array



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

No, beacuse [] is array _subscript_ operator, already used.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "r_terbush" <randy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:30 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: A shorter syntax to reference past elements of array


> Is it not possible to use a more conventional syntax like:
> 
> C - C[5] (not square brackets instead of parens)
> 
> Or as I prefer to write out since it is often hard to tell the
> difference between O and 0. 
> 
> Close - Close[5]
> 
> I would also like to be pedantic and be able to say Close[0]
> 
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Re: [amibroker] A shorter syntax to reference past elements of
> arrayHerman,
>> 
>> You are right that it maight be confusing, therefore I was thinking
> about using this short form only to reference past
>> (as it is most common scenario, considering the fact that we all the
> time attempt *not* to look into the future).
>> 
>> The whole story is just to make common expressions like C - Ref( C,
> -1 ) shorter, like this:  C - C(1) 
>> but I have second thoughts as well, as it truly may create lots of
> confusion.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz Janeczko
>> amibroker.com
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Herman 
>>   To: Tomasz Janeczko 
>>   Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:20 PM
>>   Subject: Re: [amibroker] A shorter syntax to reference past
> elements of array
>> 
>> 
>>   Sorry , but imo the new forms are critic and counter intuitive.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   C(5) looks back 5 bars.... what would looking forward look like?
> C(-5)? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   imo, very confusing. I can't help but wonder what made this idea
> surface :-)) 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   herman
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   Thursday, February 19, 2009, 11:08:25 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > As a convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
>> 
>>   > shorter syntax to very common operation of referring to past
> elements of the array.
>> 
>>   > As you now current syntax to refer to past is:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Ref( array, -bars )
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > So close five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > I don't have any technical problem with adding new
>> 
>>   > operator that will make it shorter,
>> 
>>   > but I am wondering about the most preferrable "form",
>> 
>>   > that is easy to use and does not create confusion. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > So I would like to ask you which 
>> 
>>   > "short form" would you prefer.
>> 
>>   > - C@x 
>> 
>>   > - C#5 
>> 
>>   > - C(5) 
>> 
>>   > - I don't like the idea at all
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Please use this poll to vote:
>> 
>>   > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/surveys?id=2828485
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Thank you.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Best regards,
>> 
>>   > Tomasz Janeczko
>> 
>>   > amibroker.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > ------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>> 
>>   > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>> 
>>   > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
>> 
>>   > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>> 
>>   > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>> 
>>   > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>> 
>>   > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     Individual Email | Traditional
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
>> 
>>   >     (Yahoo! ID required)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> 
>>   >     mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> 
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> 
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> 
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------

**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.

TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/