On Aug 30, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Dennis Brown wrote:
>
Hi reinsley,
>
> You have a good suggestion. Once we
get the basic list together, if
> someone wants to add a new
item it would certainly be appropriate to
> bring it up in this
thread for now. That way it could be defined
> right on
the spot and then added to the Glossary. I doubt the
>
Glossary will be ably to be modified directly by anyone except
the
> owner of the post once it goes into the UKB. We
would need a Wiki
> type database to be able to do collaborative
editing. A master list
> should be available in one place
in any case so someone else could use
> it locally for searches
in some other context.
>
> Best
regards,
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2008, at 1:26 PM, reinsley
wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello
Dennis
>>
>> The glossary is a cornerstone. Great
idea !
>>
>> I suggest to keep a place for
acronyms.
>>
>> Maybe as a way of doing to add
entries, somebody that does not know
>> the meaning of a word
or of a functionnality could add the word in
>>
the
>> list.
>> Later an advanced user will feel
free to add pedagogical
>> explanations.
>> Or many
users will fill out the entrie.
>>
>> Best
regards
>>
>>
>> ---
In
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown
<see3d@xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Keith,
>>>
>>> Here is what I would suggest.
We only work on the first 10 items
>>>
collaboratively on-line here to start. We need to get good
exposure
>>> for this initially to get lots of good ideas
from the list.
>>>
>>> I will be happy to keep
a text file of all the changes and upload it
>>> to the
files section if needed and attach it to the post at
each
>>> logical round of changes. Of course anyone
can attach a text file
>>> to
>>> the email
version of this post which I and anyone who uses the
email
>>> option will get.
>>>
>>>
Lets leave the formatting out until we get a round of feedback
on
>>> that. The first 10 should stimulate ideas for
how we should format
>>> the entries to make them most
useful.
>>>
>>> Some initial discussion will
help solidify the overall specs of the
>>> final
format.
>>>
>>> Tuzo and
Mike,
>>>
>>> You suggested using Google docs
to make a collaborative effort more
>>> efficient. I
like the idea if this was an independent project
>>> with
a
>>> dedicated team. However, there are some things
beyond just the end
>>> result to accomplish
here.
>>>
>>> 1. I would like to have
this collaborative effort done in full view
>>> of the
community and the watchful eye of Tomasz. This is
somewhat
>>> of
>>> an experiment and it can
serve as a model to inspire future
>>>
community
>>> wide collaboration on other projects with a
wide benefit. If there
>>> is
>>>
awkwardness, let's see if we can work around it, or demonstrate
a
>>> need
>>> for additional ways for the
community to interact productively. Of
>>> course it would
work better in a PHP Forum environment, but lets
>>>
work
>>> with what we have
now.
>>>
>>> 2. Suggestions should come
from anyone. Even if they only want to
>>>
participate for just a single entry on the whole project.
Having
>>> too
>>> much hidden away (out
of site, out of mind) would deprive the
>>>
project
>>> of good input.
>>>
>>>
3. EVERYONE will benefit from seeing each and every AFL or
general
>>> AmiBroker term defined in front of them again.
Think of it as an
>>> opportunity for new and old to
review all the things available and
>>> what they are good
for.
>>>
>>> I am not the worlds greatest
organizer, and I may have a tendency to
>>> have my eye on
the moon while seeing how high I can jump. I you
>>>
think
>>> I am wrong about this approach (I acknowledge it
is a bit awkward)
>>> speak up and let's find a better
way. :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
Dennis
>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 2008, at 12:07 AM,
Keith McCombs wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds good
to me.
>>>>
>>>> However, is there
somewhere we could have a document that we could
>>>>
all collaborate on without the text getting all garbled up
by
>>>> Yahoogroups, adding carriage returns, line
feeds, and >? I believe
>>>> there is some way
to do this -- just don't know what that way
is.
>>>>