[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: Will systems degrade? (was Optimization)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jtelang" <<A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>jtelang@xxxxxxxxx<FONT 
size=2>>
To: <<A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
size=2>>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:17 
PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Will systems degrade? (was 
Optimization)

> I'm not sure why it matters. In this theoretical 
scenario, assume all > 3 years are of same type, whether bull, bear, or 
trendless (or better > yet, combination of all 3) and you are assured 
that the fourth year > also has same behavior. I'm sure you'll agree that 
even if the market > behavior is same, one could be easily trying a 
strategy that displays > the behavior I described (it may not be a good 
system, but that's not > known prior to testing it anyway). 
> > The question is more 
along the lines of "should one consider the new > set of parameters that 
also took third year's data into account" > OR "should one strictly stick 
to the principle of forward testing and > dump the system (because it 
didn't work in the OOS period of 3rd > year)"?
 
IMO, it matters because up, down, 
sideways markets can have remarkably different characteristics 
that interact with the system's rules.  
<FONT 
color=#800000 size=2>If the years are the same, then I would inspect the 
rules and find out why they produced different results in the last period.  
If this is successful, modify the system and try again.  If not, dump 
the system and move on.
> > Jitu> > --- In <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
"wavemechanic" <<FONT 
size=2>wd78@x...> wrote:> 
> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "jtelang" 
<<FONT 
size=2>jtelang@x...>> > 
To: <<FONT 
size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
size=2>>> > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 4:53 PM> > 
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Will systems degrade? (was Optimization)> > 
> > > > snip> > > > > I have a 
question for proponents of back and forward testing. > Assume> 
> > that we're dealing with 3 years of data, where we use first two 
> years> > > to optimize and the third year as forward 
testing period. Further> > > assume that you get following results 
-> > >> > > 1. When optimized over first two years, 
both of those years show> > > profit, but the third year shows 
loss.> > > 2. When optimized over all three years, all three years 
show > profit,> > > although less than that showed by first 
test in first two years.> > >> > > Which set of 
parameters would you use going forward in the fourth> > > year? Or 
would you rather just dump the strategy? I personally > think> 
> > that back and forward testing makes sense ONLY if you do the > 
latter,> > > but I'm not sure that's what happens. But then... I 
could be > wrong.> > > > The first question is does 
the third year differ from the first > two.  For> > 
example, do the first two years trend up and the third down.  If > 
things are> > going to work OK, the two periods should be 
similar.  For this > reason, some> > use bull markets to 
develop bull market systems, etc., and others > use a> > 
sufficiently large data set that encompasses bull, bear, and > 
trendless> > markets to develop systems.  The first approach 
would appear to be > more> > aggressive, if one can always be 
sure what type of market one is > in.  The> > other has a 
shot at producing a robust system that rides through > all types> 
> of markets.  Choose your poison since there is no absolute 
answer.> > > > >> > > Jitu> > 
>> > > --- In <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dave 
Merrill" <<FONT 
size=2>dmerrill@x...>> > 
> wrote:> > > > I'm willing to do the work I think, have been 
trying to > already, to> > > the best> > > > 
of my limited understanding.> > > >> > > > but 
it's the concept of what to look for and how that puzzles > me.> 
> > sometimes> > > > I do get nice backtest numbers, at 
least moderately nice. but > if I> > > don't> > 
> > understand why that should be possible given what's been said > 
about> > > the> > > > dynamics of market evolution, 
why should I believe them?> > > >> > > > I keep 
coming back to the same question that I'm sure you're all> > > sick 
to> > > > death of, I know I am: if auto-optimization isn't very 
> successful,> > > doesn't> > > > that imply 
that past performance tells us very little about the> > > future, 
and> > > > if that's the case, how do we develop trading 
systems?> > > >> > > > dave> > > 
>> > > >   > ...frankly, it's hard to see how 
rational> > > >   > trading system design is 
possible in> > > >   > a world like this. or am I 
just depressed?> > > >> > > >   I like 
Edison's attitude when looking for the right material > to> > 
> use> > > >   in the light bull. When yet another 
"bright" idea (sorry I > could> > > not> > > 
>   resist) failed when tested, he is reported to have said, "We 
> are> > > >   making progress. We now know of 
999 things that will not > work."> > > >   
After trying everything from bamboo to who knows what, he> > > 
eventually> > > >   found the right material.> 
> > >> > > >   Genius is 5% inspiration and 
95% perspiration.> > > >> > > >   
b> > >> > >> > >> > > Send 
BUG REPORTS to <FONT 
size=2>bugs@x...> > > Send 
SUGGESTIONS to <FONT 
size=2>suggest@x...> > > 
-----------------------------------------> > > Post 
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > (Web page: <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/<FONT 
size=2>)> > > --------------------------------------------> 
> > Check group FAQ at:> > <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html<FONT 
size=2>> > >> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<FONT 
size=2>> > >> > >> > > 
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
---------------------~-->> Rent DVDs from home.> Over 14,500 
titles. Free Shipping> & No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!> 
<A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://us.click.yahoo.com/mk9osC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/GHeqlB/TM<FONT 
size=2>> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->> 
> Send BUG REPORTS to <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Send 
SUGGESTIONS to <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
-----------------------------------------> Post AmiQuote-related messages 
ONLY to: <FONT 
size=2>amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> (Web page: <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/<FONT 
size=2>)> --------------------------------------------> Check 
group FAQ at: <A 
href=""><FONT 
size=2>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html<FONT 
size=2> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
<FONT 
size=2>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/<FONT 
size=2> > > 






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.