[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: The [unknown] next bar Support



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Herman,
I need some more time, more checks, more examples etc.
This was a good session.
85% of the predicted Lows were in the light category [<2% error]
65% of the predicted Lows were in the tough category [<1% error]
and , although it is not over yet, I do not expect many things to 
change.
Since you know me, you would also know that codes are upside down, I 
will give a more proper appearence tomorrow.
DT
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Herman van den Bergen" 
<psytek@xxxx> wrote:
> Nice DT, did i miss the code on this thread?
> 
> I know you DT, You love to keep us in suspense before popping the 
code!
> 
> Herman
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Dimitris Tsokakis [mailto:TSOKAKIS@x...]
>   Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:03 PM
>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Subject: [amibroker] The [unknown] next bar Support
> 
> 
>   Here is my first attempt to predict the next bar Low.
>   The statistical results are not bad at all.
>   In the attached gif, next bar candles are plotted together with 
todays
> Support prediction for tomorrow
>   [the last candle is missing, since it is not known yet.]
>   The support line is green when we predict tomorrows Low with less 
than 2%
> error
>   For ^NDX it was possible 148 from the last 200 bars [74%] , from 
the end
> of last Aug.
>   For AMGN it was the 84%
>   71 stocks of the N100 database obtained less than 2% Low 
approximation for
> more than the half of the 200-bar test period.
>   How about a less than 1% error between the predicted and the 
actual Low?
>   For ^NDX it was possible the 48% of the last 200 bars.
>   9 stocks were between 50% and 60% of this period.
>   The decay rate was not dramatic, 34 stocks were "less than 1% 
correct"
> more than the 40% of their trading bars.
>   Instead of various artificial [and many times unrealistic] 
Support levels
> [previous supports, Fibonacci supports, even trendlines supports]
>   is it better to *know* next bar Low with less than 2% error for 
the
> majority [71%] of the stocks ?
>   Think about...
>   Dimitris Tsokakis
> 
> 
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
>   Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
>   -----------------------------------------
>   Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
>   --------------------------------------------
>   Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> 
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/